you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

because it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    If AI continues to be treated as transformative work, there should also be a valid case to kill licensing requirements for sampling music. After all, there you're literally using small clips of someone's music or similar to make undeniably new art.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    So if I modify someone else's art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments