you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

I'm convinced that learning to terraform our own planet is essential before moving out into the stars. If we won't take our own ecosystem seriously we can't possibly go out there and build new ones to live in.

It's actually really obvious the more you think about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    Antarctica is hilariously more habitable than Mars, but none of these techbro futurists ever move to Antarctica. lathe-of-heaven

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    It's funny to think of scifi now in the context of the current eco crisis. All those worlds full of industry and pollution, for hundreds if not thousands of years. It's been a blindspot of scifi writing and worldbuilding when you really think about it... It is physically impossible for a space faring species to not become terraformers with a huge consciousness about what they're doing with the planets they colonise. It's literally essential.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago*

    JB Foster argues that modern environmentalism doesn't take off until the first nuclear tests in the 1940s, and even then, much of it was liberal in character. In the couple of centuries before that, local environmental degradation such as smog and water pollution might trigger protest. Marx's theory of a metabolic rift was, according to Foster, the first really ecological theory in the modern sense, and even then, Marx's ecology was not widely appreciated among Marxists until the 1990s.

    All that is to say that the mere concept of an ecosystem is relatively new and, in the late 20th century as science fiction really took off, ecology was still abstract for most people. It's only in the 21st century that ecology has asserted itself concretely and shed its abstract veneer. Now it is without question not only that ecology matters, but that its scale is global rather than local, systemic rather than individual.

  • source
  • parent