▲ 405 ▼ Germany plans sugar tax that includes sugar free drinks (brusselssignal.eu) submitted 3 days ago by time2lose@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] glasratz@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 child) Apple juice isn't really healthier than soft drinks, especially sugar-wise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) After the first one. One is likely good for you, but more and it's a bit like drinking coke. Pulp based smoothies are more healthy through. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago Fruit juice is the sugar of the fruits without the fibers. So not much different than a soda sugar wise. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glasratz@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 child) No. Juice is not good for you. And smoothies are still worse than fresh fruit. And fruit is still worse than vegetables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) "A plausible explanation as to why fruit juices may lead to different health effects from those of sugar-sweetened beverages is that fruit juices are a source of various bioactive compounds, such as vitamins (vitamin C, folate, etc.), minerals (mostly potassium), and antioxidants [73], while sugar-sweetened beverages generally have none. Antioxidants were shown to decrease oxidative stress [91], which plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, diabetes, and dyslipidemia [92]." https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1006 Please don't spout opinions not based in fact. There is more to fruit juice than just sugar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Please don't post excerpts from studies without reading the conclusion. This study doesn't conclude what you want it to. The sentece about antioxidants for example is about antioxidants in general and not about whether their consumption in fruit juices has health benefits. The study basically says there's a lack of data to assess the situation. Here, look at this more recent study that compared different kinds of fruit juices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213453024001915 It concludes that fruit juices have less health risks the more they resemble fresh fruit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) But juice resembles fruit more than sweetened drinks... So clearly better then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) After the first one. One is likely good for you, but more and it's a bit like drinking coke. Pulp based smoothies are more healthy through. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago Fruit juice is the sugar of the fruits without the fibers. So not much different than a soda sugar wise. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glasratz@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 child) No. Juice is not good for you. And smoothies are still worse than fresh fruit. And fruit is still worse than vegetables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) "A plausible explanation as to why fruit juices may lead to different health effects from those of sugar-sweetened beverages is that fruit juices are a source of various bioactive compounds, such as vitamins (vitamin C, folate, etc.), minerals (mostly potassium), and antioxidants [73], while sugar-sweetened beverages generally have none. Antioxidants were shown to decrease oxidative stress [91], which plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, diabetes, and dyslipidemia [92]." https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1006 Please don't spout opinions not based in fact. There is more to fruit juice than just sugar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Please don't post excerpts from studies without reading the conclusion. This study doesn't conclude what you want it to. The sentece about antioxidants for example is about antioxidants in general and not about whether their consumption in fruit juices has health benefits. The study basically says there's a lack of data to assess the situation. Here, look at this more recent study that compared different kinds of fruit juices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213453024001915 It concludes that fruit juices have less health risks the more they resemble fresh fruit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) But juice resembles fruit more than sweetened drinks... So clearly better then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago Fruit juice is the sugar of the fruits without the fibers. So not much different than a soda sugar wise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glasratz@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 child) No. Juice is not good for you. And smoothies are still worse than fresh fruit. And fruit is still worse than vegetables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) "A plausible explanation as to why fruit juices may lead to different health effects from those of sugar-sweetened beverages is that fruit juices are a source of various bioactive compounds, such as vitamins (vitamin C, folate, etc.), minerals (mostly potassium), and antioxidants [73], while sugar-sweetened beverages generally have none. Antioxidants were shown to decrease oxidative stress [91], which plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, diabetes, and dyslipidemia [92]." https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1006 Please don't spout opinions not based in fact. There is more to fruit juice than just sugar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Please don't post excerpts from studies without reading the conclusion. This study doesn't conclude what you want it to. The sentece about antioxidants for example is about antioxidants in general and not about whether their consumption in fruit juices has health benefits. The study basically says there's a lack of data to assess the situation. Here, look at this more recent study that compared different kinds of fruit juices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213453024001915 It concludes that fruit juices have less health risks the more they resemble fresh fruit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) But juice resembles fruit more than sweetened drinks... So clearly better then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) "A plausible explanation as to why fruit juices may lead to different health effects from those of sugar-sweetened beverages is that fruit juices are a source of various bioactive compounds, such as vitamins (vitamin C, folate, etc.), minerals (mostly potassium), and antioxidants [73], while sugar-sweetened beverages generally have none. Antioxidants were shown to decrease oxidative stress [91], which plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, diabetes, and dyslipidemia [92]." https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1006 Please don't spout opinions not based in fact. There is more to fruit juice than just sugar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Please don't post excerpts from studies without reading the conclusion. This study doesn't conclude what you want it to. The sentece about antioxidants for example is about antioxidants in general and not about whether their consumption in fruit juices has health benefits. The study basically says there's a lack of data to assess the situation. Here, look at this more recent study that compared different kinds of fruit juices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213453024001915 It concludes that fruit juices have less health risks the more they resemble fresh fruit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) But juice resembles fruit more than sweetened drinks... So clearly better then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glasratz@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Please don't post excerpts from studies without reading the conclusion. This study doesn't conclude what you want it to. The sentece about antioxidants for example is about antioxidants in general and not about whether their consumption in fruit juices has health benefits. The study basically says there's a lack of data to assess the situation. Here, look at this more recent study that compared different kinds of fruit juices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213453024001915 It concludes that fruit juices have less health risks the more they resemble fresh fruit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) But juice resembles fruit more than sweetened drinks... So clearly better then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) But juice resembles fruit more than sweetened drinks... So clearly better then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glasratz@feddit.org 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) You need to conduct your own study to proof that. Your study claims that there's no real evidence for that, especially since other studies didn't account for lifesyle and amount that was consumed enough. permalink fedilink source parent