▲ 997 ▼ Amanda Watson, the engineer who pioneered the AirLink and several other technologies for Oculus, was hired at Valve. (thelemmy.club) submitted 20 hours ago by rtxn@lemmy.world to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz 96 comments fedilink hide all child comments An article about her work at Oculus and Meta: XR Update No Frame today, it looks like.
[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 149 points 20 hours ago (2 children) Nice! 2 hours ago in case anyone was wondering how old the screenshot is. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] thedoginthewok@lemmy.world 1 point 4 hours ago I was wondering that! I thought the Steam Frame was going to be available "soon", so it came as a bit of a surprise that they just hired someone to work on it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] snooggums@piefed.world 95 points 20 hours ago (4 children) Thank you! Social media's use of time since posting of timestamps is so frustrating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 16 hours ago (1 child) I would so much rather just have a full timestamp. I can do the delta fine myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago And most of the time I’m just using the delta to get to the timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children) Yes, but it makes sense in relation to other posts. It is just frustrating after longer period of time then a few minutes or hours, or when screenshot like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (1 child) The layouts generally have room to state time in relation and the actual time. Even a simple date would be better than only relational. Most hide the real time in a hover over or click on the relational time whoch isn't captured in a screenshot. Social media screenshots are so common it is time to update to show both be default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* But then it wouldn’t drive you crazy, and you wouldn’t sign up and find the post just to find out the actual time And if you don’t make the conversion then that’s basically stealing /s ^but not really, they actually think like this^ permalink fedilink source parent [–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 child) I think the compromise is a visual indicator of age - color or an icon indicating recency, in addition to a good old fashioned date timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) I'm not a fan of coloring for age of post. Usually the compromise is, when mouse hover it will show the actual date in a on hover popup. How about when clicking the time it changes to a timestamp (and back) or while mouse is hovering / touching the time it changes on the fly (without any hover tip, Edit: I just realized that most people don't use a mouse on their phone :D also this would require dynamic changing with JavaScript). permalink fedilink source parent [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) It makes perfect sense when using the website. The problem isn’t the timestamp, it’s the lazy people who share fuzzy inaccessible screenshots instead of links. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 point 13 hours ago it makes sense to include the time passed since posting, yes doesn't make much sense to not include the date and time posted permalink fedilink source parent [+] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works -6 points 20 hours ago (2 children) But that’s perfectly fine if you’re not screen grabbing and posting elsewhere? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago no, it's not just show me the damn time it was posted. I hate when only relative information is given. permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 14 points 20 hours ago So then what you’re saying is it’s not fine. Cause screenshots of Twitter is basically all the internet is these days. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thedoginthewok@lemmy.world 1 point 4 hours ago I was wondering that! I thought the Steam Frame was going to be available "soon", so it came as a bit of a surprise that they just hired someone to work on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 95 points 20 hours ago (4 children) Thank you! Social media's use of time since posting of timestamps is so frustrating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 16 hours ago (1 child) I would so much rather just have a full timestamp. I can do the delta fine myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago And most of the time I’m just using the delta to get to the timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children) Yes, but it makes sense in relation to other posts. It is just frustrating after longer period of time then a few minutes or hours, or when screenshot like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (1 child) The layouts generally have room to state time in relation and the actual time. Even a simple date would be better than only relational. Most hide the real time in a hover over or click on the relational time whoch isn't captured in a screenshot. Social media screenshots are so common it is time to update to show both be default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* But then it wouldn’t drive you crazy, and you wouldn’t sign up and find the post just to find out the actual time And if you don’t make the conversion then that’s basically stealing /s ^but not really, they actually think like this^ permalink fedilink source parent [–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 child) I think the compromise is a visual indicator of age - color or an icon indicating recency, in addition to a good old fashioned date timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) I'm not a fan of coloring for age of post. Usually the compromise is, when mouse hover it will show the actual date in a on hover popup. How about when clicking the time it changes to a timestamp (and back) or while mouse is hovering / touching the time it changes on the fly (without any hover tip, Edit: I just realized that most people don't use a mouse on their phone :D also this would require dynamic changing with JavaScript). permalink fedilink source parent [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) It makes perfect sense when using the website. The problem isn’t the timestamp, it’s the lazy people who share fuzzy inaccessible screenshots instead of links. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 point 13 hours ago it makes sense to include the time passed since posting, yes doesn't make much sense to not include the date and time posted permalink fedilink source parent [+] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works -6 points 20 hours ago (2 children) But that’s perfectly fine if you’re not screen grabbing and posting elsewhere? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago no, it's not just show me the damn time it was posted. I hate when only relative information is given. permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 14 points 20 hours ago So then what you’re saying is it’s not fine. Cause screenshots of Twitter is basically all the internet is these days. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 16 hours ago (1 child) I would so much rather just have a full timestamp. I can do the delta fine myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago And most of the time I’m just using the delta to get to the timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago And most of the time I’m just using the delta to get to the timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children) Yes, but it makes sense in relation to other posts. It is just frustrating after longer period of time then a few minutes or hours, or when screenshot like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (1 child) The layouts generally have room to state time in relation and the actual time. Even a simple date would be better than only relational. Most hide the real time in a hover over or click on the relational time whoch isn't captured in a screenshot. Social media screenshots are so common it is time to update to show both be default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* But then it wouldn’t drive you crazy, and you wouldn’t sign up and find the post just to find out the actual time And if you don’t make the conversion then that’s basically stealing /s ^but not really, they actually think like this^ permalink fedilink source parent [–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 child) I think the compromise is a visual indicator of age - color or an icon indicating recency, in addition to a good old fashioned date timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) I'm not a fan of coloring for age of post. Usually the compromise is, when mouse hover it will show the actual date in a on hover popup. How about when clicking the time it changes to a timestamp (and back) or while mouse is hovering / touching the time it changes on the fly (without any hover tip, Edit: I just realized that most people don't use a mouse on their phone :D also this would require dynamic changing with JavaScript). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (1 child) The layouts generally have room to state time in relation and the actual time. Even a simple date would be better than only relational. Most hide the real time in a hover over or click on the relational time whoch isn't captured in a screenshot. Social media screenshots are so common it is time to update to show both be default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* But then it wouldn’t drive you crazy, and you wouldn’t sign up and find the post just to find out the actual time And if you don’t make the conversion then that’s basically stealing /s ^but not really, they actually think like this^ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* But then it wouldn’t drive you crazy, and you wouldn’t sign up and find the post just to find out the actual time And if you don’t make the conversion then that’s basically stealing /s ^but not really, they actually think like this^ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 child) I think the compromise is a visual indicator of age - color or an icon indicating recency, in addition to a good old fashioned date timestamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) I'm not a fan of coloring for age of post. Usually the compromise is, when mouse hover it will show the actual date in a on hover popup. How about when clicking the time it changes to a timestamp (and back) or while mouse is hovering / touching the time it changes on the fly (without any hover tip, Edit: I just realized that most people don't use a mouse on their phone :D also this would require dynamic changing with JavaScript). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) I'm not a fan of coloring for age of post. Usually the compromise is, when mouse hover it will show the actual date in a on hover popup. How about when clicking the time it changes to a timestamp (and back) or while mouse is hovering / touching the time it changes on the fly (without any hover tip, Edit: I just realized that most people don't use a mouse on their phone :D also this would require dynamic changing with JavaScript). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) It makes perfect sense when using the website. The problem isn’t the timestamp, it’s the lazy people who share fuzzy inaccessible screenshots instead of links. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 point 13 hours ago it makes sense to include the time passed since posting, yes doesn't make much sense to not include the date and time posted permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 point 13 hours ago it makes sense to include the time passed since posting, yes doesn't make much sense to not include the date and time posted permalink fedilink source parent
[+] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works -6 points 20 hours ago (2 children) But that’s perfectly fine if you’re not screen grabbing and posting elsewhere? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago no, it's not just show me the damn time it was posted. I hate when only relative information is given. permalink fedilink source parent [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 14 points 20 hours ago So then what you’re saying is it’s not fine. Cause screenshots of Twitter is basically all the internet is these days. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago no, it's not just show me the damn time it was posted. I hate when only relative information is given. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 14 points 20 hours ago So then what you’re saying is it’s not fine. Cause screenshots of Twitter is basically all the internet is these days. permalink fedilink source parent
