A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image shows a display of Changjian-1000 missiles, which are hypersonic cruise missiles with high manuverability and quick launch times. The linked archived article has several more images and descriptions of Chinese missile technology.


My weekly preamble is in spoiler tags below.

preambleAside from the virtually daily Iranian strikes on the Oman route, the main threat that the US is facing in this newest phase of the war is logistics. With Bahrain and the UAE unsafe, the closest safest port in the theater is Diego Garcia, which is over 2000 miles away. Either the aircraft carriers would have to go to Diego Garcia to restock, which would be even less planes and missiles available should hostilities restart suddenly, or goods have to be shuttled to the aircraft carriers from Diego Garcia. This latter option appears to be too much for the US to handle, with widespread reports of dwindling supplies and morale on the USS Abraham Lincoln (and, to a lesser extent, the USS George HW Bush). These reports have culminated in the USS George Washington being sent from the Pacific to replace the Lincoln, which was the sole aircraft carrier in that whole theater. There are six more carriers in maintenance, leaving two carriers left that could even hypothetically be called upon should the USS George HW Bush need replacement; both are currently undergoing training, and of these two, the USS Theodore Roosevelt might be available soon; perhaps even as soon as September. I'm unsure whether the Roosevelt will be sent to the Pacific to replace the Washington, or if it'll be sent to the Middle East to replace the Bush. Nonetheless, that the situation has deteriorated to the point where we can speculate on how very limited naval vessels are going to be distributed is yet one more indication among many of the decline of US naval power. The symbolism was too much for me to ignore, hence the title: the last aircraft carrier in the Pacific being forced to leave, and not under military pressure in some hypothetical war against China, but to try and relieve logistical burdens elsewhere in a war of the US's own making.

This joins Trump's statements that the US will only be taking a very limited part in the South Korean military exercises. This is nominally because of the "great ties" the US shares with the DPRK, but this is an embarrassingly transparent face-saving statement. The DPRK is an increasingly major potential threat to South Korea, a major regional power and economy, but are also helping Russia with both manpower and materiel and getting military experience and data on their missiles' effectiveness in return.

The US's Under Secretary of War, Elbridge Colby, recently visited the Philippines. There, he gave a speech that promised to continue the construction of a defensive network that would deny China the possibility of militarily advancing through the Pacific by stationing US forces inside friendly countries. This is the NATO approach: our mere presence will deter the enemy because they would not want to start a direct war with us, and in exchange, you have to hand over billions upon billions of dollars. Colby gave the Philippines that most backhanded of compliments, the "model ally", and stated that the US was “definitely not disengaging from Asia”. My "We aren't pivoting away from Asia" shirt has people asking a lot of questions that are already answered by my shirt.

If you're a US-friendly country in the Pacific and possess even the slightest sense of self-preservation, you are surely feeling nervous. The US is moving its aircraft carrier out of the theater. Overseas, you've seen how Iran - a very strong regional country, to be sure, but not as powerful as the industrial juggernaut and nuclear superpower that is China - has nonetheless crippled several undefendable US bases, has exhausted a very large amount of American air defense missiles, is holding the global economy hostage, and the US can seemingly do nothing to stop them. You have to be looking at your own US bases, likely expensive and unpopular, and all the money you're handing over to the US, and glancing at how the Gulf states are bickering of being betrayed by their ally who promised them protection and immediately retreated. You have to be looking at your economy and its dependence on China. You have to be looking at Ukraine, and the unenviable state of destruction it has been driven to as a puppet of the US. You have to be looking at China itself, and how its military is rapidly developing in all fields, and how it's even catching up on microchip development. In all, you have to be really hoping that China is serious that they only plan a peaceful reunification with Taiwan, and that the US will not do something incredibly, stupidly reckless in their decline.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good/funny reply to that in there:

At what point do you decide if Donbas is even worth continuing the war over? The region was 60% Russian and secessionist before the war even started. The Ukrainians that were there have either fled, died, or content enough with Russian rule and Russian neighbors that they stayed in their homes in the middle of a warzone and accepted the takeover.

The infrastructure is destroyed, the land ruined, bombed, and mined, filled with debris and rotting corpses.

Impossibly bad blood between any remaining Russian and Ukrainians residents that would reside there in the future.....

The Ukrainian government couldn't effectively rule over Donbas for 10 years before the war started. Constant civil war, military action, insurrection, and oppressive anti-Russian civil laws, and rampant secessionist political parties.

Now today? Tomorrow? Like the Russian army could walk out of Donbas and return home today and Ukraine could not effectively rule the area better than they had from 2014 to 2022 - that job you already failed at just got 100x harder. Ukraine couldn't take back Donbas even if there was no Russian military there.

Ukraine is the dog chasing its tail, that never considers what to do with it once it catches it. Ruling over a post-war Donbas filled with a ton of Ukrainian-Russians would be less pleasant than cutting your own dick off with kid scissors. Conceding the region and ending the war is their better option.

Take the L, save your people and your economy, behave graciously on the world stage, the entire sympathetic West is begging to do business in Ukraine during rebuilding but they can't start until the war ends. Enjoy your new Western economic partners that you exchanged brother Russia for, and hope your new friends were worth it and trusted partners with good intentions. It's the bed you made. Kyiv and the Obama/Bidens tried to drag the entire country to the West, not culturally understanding Eastern Ukraines deep, deep unchangeable Russian roots.

Stop begging for war money. End the war, and start a global campaign across the EU & USA asking for economic investment while the iron is hot. Business, industry, entertainment, travel, create jobs, pursue economic prosperity. I even think you can bargain some level of reparations from Russia if you negotiate the end of the war well. It's cheaper for Russia to pay you dividends than to fuel an entire war machine. You have a golden opportunity.

In divorce you are expected to share 50% of your assets. Ukraine just went through its divorce. You don't get to keep 100%. Russia asked for 20%, what a deal, be grateful because this new reality is honestly the best outcome for all involved parties. Sign the papers.

Surely you aren't just continuing the war indefinitely to be a puppet of the West as a proxy vector attack on Russia at the low low cost of Ukrainian blood? Right? Right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Nice idea but impossible for Ukrainian leadership politically. If they sign a peace deal before there are Russians in Kiev, they'll all be branded traitors and get merced by whatever Azov guys still exist. It's still the correct thing to do if you care about Ukrainian lives, but they clearly don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Zelenskyy is probably getting merced the instant the war is over regardless, and he knows it, Azov will absolutely just blame him and try to take control of whatever tiny rump state remains and turn it into a factory for terrorists.

    His best chance of survival is probably letting the Russians capture him and spending the rest of his life in a Russian prison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 days ago* (1 child)

    His best chance for survival is being in France or Poland when Kiev falls and running off to a mansion in Miami or something and living like a king off the hundreds of millions of dollars he stole and paying for some bodyguards with that money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 days ago*

    I think it's likely that the US will throw him to the wolves, they generally aren't too nice to their compradors who have outlived their usefulness. The mansion in Miami he's dreaming of is probably his best case scenario, but doesn't mean it's his best chance to actually survive, it requires the US to continue to support him even if he isn't useful to them, and he's far more useful as a scapegoat once the war ends, or even as a martyr than he is as some rich nobody hiding out in Miami.

    If he has the forethought to flee juuuust before things get too bad he might get out and flee to the US, but that would require very good timing, and as we've seen with his temper tantrums and demands, he doesn't seem like the sort of leader who is shrewd enough to do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Do people still honestly believe Ukraine would not just ethnically cleanse and resettle Donbass had it won?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 days ago

    Liberals refuse to acknowledge that Ukraine was invaded because they were carrying out an ethnic cleansing. If you acknowledge the ethnic cleansing it's pretty hard to be too upset about the invasion and really complicates the idea that Russia=Bad in all circumstances and at all times. Of course if you do recognize that Ukraine was carrying out an ethnic cleansing then you'll also notice that the material circumstances motivating it haven't changed at all, so of course they'll do it again, immediately, when they have the chance.

  • source
  • parent