The North American box office totaled $8.87 billion in 2025, which is still 22% below pre-pandemic levels. Recorded music revenue hit a record $11.5 billion. Live music like concerts and festivals brought in $18.51 billion. Meanwhile, book publishers tracked by the Association of American Publishers reported $14.6 billion for the year. And the U.S. museum industry generated an estimated $16.4 billion. Add it up and the total comes to roughly $70 billion, which is less than half what Americans wagered on sports.

“It fills that void, and it will crowd out other forms of entertainment, other forms of hospitality, for sure,” said Martin “Marty” Conway, an adjunct lecturer in Georgetown University’s Sports Industry Management program. Sports gambling, in all respects, has become more ubiquitous, and as a result, is becoming more accepted as yet another form of entertainment. “They’ve taken something that was just who’s going to win, and now you’re actually able to get involved in certain other events of the game. That’s a form of engagement as opposed to what we knew previously.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

I feel like sports gambling is probably fewer people spending more money. And that money is a lot easier to pry from people than someone having to physically go to a museum, theater, or concert venue.

Like if I go to a movie X number of times a year, that's obviously going to be less money than being a gambling addict spending the same amount daily or every couple of days on sports bets. Obviously the money would be better spent on going to a movie, but it's psychological engineering. So how much does this really say?

How trustworthy are the people interviewed in this? Because "an adjunct lecturer in Georgetown University’s Sports Industry Management program" does not sound like a neutral observer.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    An adjunct lecturer is just an academic on a shitty precarious contract. The person is probably an expert in this shit with a PhD and everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago* (1 child)

    Wouldn't a "sports industry management program" be skewed to view sports gambling as a positive? It's not like researching it, it's specifically to teach people sports industry management. And the article is saying "look how massive the sports industry is".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Nah, programmes with titles like that usually function as marketing slogans for something much more traditional, both to draw in know-nothing students and to appease managers and administrators by covering everything in nonsense buzzwords. And again, this is an underpaid academic on a shit contract. They probably don’t believe in everything the upper administrators say any more than any other low-rung employee believes the bullshit that their big bosses say. Sometimes a job is a job.

    Or they might be a total foaming-at-the-mouth chud, fuck knows.

  • source
  • parent