▲ 842 ▼ This HAS to be satire (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 days ago by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 328 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] 0x0@lemmy.zip -16 points 3 days ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 9 points 3 days ago You're an actual psychopath and you should be locked away before you kill someone permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swemg@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 child) Lol, if touching a side mirror gets you that angry you need to look in a mirror and think about whats wrong with you. Also I'm a carpenter, I most often have my tools with me, I could do way worse than "hitting" a side mirror if you really need something to get upset about. I bet you get half hard looking at your rolling box ^^ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Unpopular opinion: Cars are expensive. Vandalizing them in response to an inconvenience seems like an overreaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 child) It’s symmetrical though. Sort of like a pedestrian risking death if they inconvenience car drivers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad. Not sure I'd consider them "symmetrical" though... Maybe I'm being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse. Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago True. However given that they're the largest "lifestyle" contributor to climate change (as opposed to things in the agricultural sector), vandalizing one in response to it simply existing seems like a slight under reaction, if anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swemg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 child) Cutting the priority to pedestrian isn't an inconvenience tho. It's straight up code violation. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be a priority for the police 🤷🏻 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago A medal for meritorious public service and right of first refusal to carry out the sentence against the ecocidal narcissists? That'd be a well deserved surprise for any non-carhole who's been making carholes angry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 9 points 3 days ago You're an actual psychopath and you should be locked away before you kill someone permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Swemg@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 child) Lol, if touching a side mirror gets you that angry you need to look in a mirror and think about whats wrong with you. Also I'm a carpenter, I most often have my tools with me, I could do way worse than "hitting" a side mirror if you really need something to get upset about. I bet you get half hard looking at your rolling box ^^ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Unpopular opinion: Cars are expensive. Vandalizing them in response to an inconvenience seems like an overreaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 child) It’s symmetrical though. Sort of like a pedestrian risking death if they inconvenience car drivers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad. Not sure I'd consider them "symmetrical" though... Maybe I'm being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse. Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago True. However given that they're the largest "lifestyle" contributor to climate change (as opposed to things in the agricultural sector), vandalizing one in response to it simply existing seems like a slight under reaction, if anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swemg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 child) Cutting the priority to pedestrian isn't an inconvenience tho. It's straight up code violation. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be a priority for the police 🤷🏻 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] percent@infosec.pub -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Unpopular opinion: Cars are expensive. Vandalizing them in response to an inconvenience seems like an overreaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 child) It’s symmetrical though. Sort of like a pedestrian risking death if they inconvenience car drivers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad. Not sure I'd consider them "symmetrical" though... Maybe I'm being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse. Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago True. However given that they're the largest "lifestyle" contributor to climate change (as opposed to things in the agricultural sector), vandalizing one in response to it simply existing seems like a slight under reaction, if anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swemg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 child) Cutting the priority to pedestrian isn't an inconvenience tho. It's straight up code violation. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be a priority for the police 🤷🏻 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 child) It’s symmetrical though. Sort of like a pedestrian risking death if they inconvenience car drivers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad. Not sure I'd consider them "symmetrical" though... Maybe I'm being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse. Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Sure, attempting to murder a pedestrian over an inconvenience is also bad. Not sure I'd consider them "symmetrical" though... Maybe I'm being pedantic, but murder seems a lot worse. Regardless, both are overreactions, and varying degrees of crazy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago True. However given that they're the largest "lifestyle" contributor to climate change (as opposed to things in the agricultural sector), vandalizing one in response to it simply existing seems like a slight under reaction, if anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Swemg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 child) Cutting the priority to pedestrian isn't an inconvenience tho. It's straight up code violation. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be a priority for the police 🤷🏻 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] percent@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago Oh, I see. It still seems like an overreaction to a code violation though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago A medal for meritorious public service and right of first refusal to carry out the sentence against the ecocidal narcissists? That'd be a well deserved surprise for any non-carhole who's been making carholes angry. permalink fedilink source parent
