The national debt is expected to hit a record high as soon as this week, crossing a major threshold of $40 trillion. Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins explains why that milestone is a warning sign for many economists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

Nobody’s going to like this answer. But the simple reality is this. Basically everything has to be cut.

Actually, exactly the opposite, corruption needs to be cut,

Cutting anything else just makes the problem worse.

Yes, the rich need to pay their fair share. But there’s no way we can tax our way out of that kind of debt. It is not realistic. It is pure fantasy to think a person a company an organization, a country or anything else can literally bring in that kind of money. It’s impossible.

You dont get out of this by cutting, that just leads to a depression.

You get out of this by aggressively going after corruption and corrupt loans, declaring those loans to be void, and enforcing that.

The other alternative is the entire country goes bankrupt.

Cutting everything is how the country goes bankrupt, thats literally the whole goal.

The very wealthy get in positions of power, and make the goverment go into massive debt giving them huge paydays. Then you cut all the things the government is supposed to do to service that "debt." The economy takes a nosedive, but thats ok, you can just borrow more money to pay the very wealthy. Then make the government decalare bankruptcy, and "sell" the government off to private holdings (who own all that debt) for pennies on the dollar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    I'd be fine with this, as long as the rich were properly dealt with, first and foremost.

    And I mean all of them. The Waltons? Nearly all the money they've made should go toward the national debt.

    The Sacklers? All of their money to the debt, all of them imprisoned for what they've done.

    And so on down the list, it would leave many of those families completely destitute and nearly destroyed, and then we can start cutting from the actual innocent people in the country who haven't, y'know, tried to destroy it for their own personal gain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments