PR damage control in full effect, theyre hurting! Keep cutting!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 68 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Typical. Corp does evil, people get wise to it and take action, politicians and advocacy groups like the ACLU call for some "adequate safety measures", and corp does damage control. The cameras stay up, the network expands, and a future OTA update rolls back whatever concessions the corp and cops made now after giving the frogs time boil.

Well I don't want "adequate safety measures". I don't care about the "balancing act" between surveillance police state tech and privacy that this article mentioned. There is no compromise. These cameras should not exist and anything less is unacceptable.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Oops! There was a regression error and we accidentally rolled back the privacy mitigation! And we'll accidentally do it again later, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    will make what were once optional guardrails mandatory for its users to implement by Jan. 1.

    Jan. 1.

    It's more insulting than that. They're hedging their bets that they won't have to do it at all in the first place, first.

    Their fascist die roll doesn't land, then they can swap to the standard corpo bullshit described above.

  • source
  • parent