This wouldn't have been an issue if the organization bought a $1,000 NAS and populated it with a few hard drives.

🗃️ 🗃️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

important enough to maintain a local copy backup. tis why I tagged #3-2-1%20ignore you only need the machine on when adding to the archive. Then just shit it back down and leave it alone. Nope.
Regular backup tests is part of backup hygiene.
Otherwise you have duds you need to replace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    To make your comment more readable, you need to edit your comment to add another line break between what you quoted and your response to it (i.e. a blank line before "Nope.").

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I don't understand what you're trying to say, and I feel like that's because you don't know how comments work...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    They screwed up the formatting, but it's clear what they're saying. They quoted you saying you don't even need electricity for archives, and they're telling you that if you don't test your backups, you don't have backups.

  • source
  • parent