Is that bad?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

I dunno I didn't want OP to think I was taking a shot at them, it was an intentionally over-the-top comment but it has always bugged me how unwieldy it is to say "cellular". it's fine as a biology term but kind of a brick for a word you use dozens of times a day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Fair enough! You are totally correct that it's clunky as all hell though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [B] 2 points 1 month ago

    I think it would probably be a way to say, an additional few lines of adjectives without punctuation. A lot of people want adjectives with more than natural exceptions, so I would suggest reducing it on a source basis to "alternative" to "nonological beliefs" as more than a "science" or "unslamation" to further morph into any definition, "non-human purposes", it's much simpler. A similar definition is that it's very simplistic. They just want to take a little break, and s * e you tohale *cockBorn.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Oh I thought it was a good comment! I was wondering why you took it down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments