▲ 161 ▼ Supercut of Mike Lindell's problematic deposition (www.youtube.com) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by TokyoMonsterTrucker@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/news@beehaw.org 61 comments fedilink hide all child comments Mike Lindell's behavior in deposition has earned him a motion for sanctions. See all of the exhibits in one cut.
[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You didn't get to the part where he outright started calling the lawyer an asshole, did you? Morbid curiosity, but there's only so much of this type of possession I can take. Imagine having to work for this egotistical fuck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) My favorite part is where the attorney asked him to list the other members of the 'crime family'. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That was funny but ultimately probably irrelevant to the case except as it relates to giving a view into Lindell's insanity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) my impression of how the attorney pointedly pursued that is that it was a new crime, or civil something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago Ya maybe new instance of defamation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) My favorite part is where the attorney asked him to list the other members of the 'crime family'. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That was funny but ultimately probably irrelevant to the case except as it relates to giving a view into Lindell's insanity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) my impression of how the attorney pointedly pursued that is that it was a new crime, or civil something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago Ya maybe new instance of defamation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That was funny but ultimately probably irrelevant to the case except as it relates to giving a view into Lindell's insanity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) my impression of how the attorney pointedly pursued that is that it was a new crime, or civil something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago Ya maybe new instance of defamation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) my impression of how the attorney pointedly pursued that is that it was a new crime, or civil something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago Ya maybe new instance of defamation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago Ya maybe new instance of defamation. permalink fedilink source parent