you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 120 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Well that’s the end of EA. The owners will tear it apart and bleed it dry.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    People have been predicting the death of EA for over twenty years.

    Meanwhile, they release another Madden and another FIFA and another Sims and another Star Wars, then mint themselves another $7B. Nevermind that all of these games are just reskinned copies of the games they've been releasing going back to the mid-90s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yesn't.

    That may have been somewhat true in the past, but it is hard to articulate just how big of a hole they are in right now. The leveraged buyout has pushed EA's debt to over $20Billion USD.

    They make that money back or they might not, but they are going to absolutely pillage and destroy the company in the process. The word that often follows "leveraged buyout" is "bankruptcy". It's a tale as old as corporate history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Maybe. But there's an enormous amount of money to wring out of EA, even with the debts. And you can go back decades to read about their deplorable labor practices. This isn't even the first time EA has been subjected to this kind of aggressive cash hungry squeeze.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago*

    Another Sims? Don't be daft. They'll release another Sims DLC and get all the money with much less effort.

    Seriously, 4 has been a cash cow for over a decade now, with biannual expansion packs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 child)

    I did a buad report on EA going on 20 years ago. TLDR they're basically Martin Shkreli but a corporation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Like Martin Shkreli in that they'll increase the price of a life-saving drug 20x without consequences, or like Martin Shkreli in that they'll go to prison for defrauding rich investors?

    Seriously fucked up that the second was considered a crime, but not the first, in Shkreli's case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Probably the former as I doubt defrauding a Saudi prince would result in mere incarceration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Fair, though since it was a leveraged buyout, I reckon it would be JP Morgan Chase who'd be getting defrauded. The only question is whether MBS wants that kind of image for the saudi PIF.

    Essentially, MBS and Kushner would find a way to spin all the valuable IPs into other companies and leave only the debt and maybe some IPs at EA Games. Then it becomes a worthless company that owes JPMorgan Chase 20 billion with a fairly high interest rate.

  • source
  • parent