79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine a world without capitalism.

We don't give their heirs wealth my dude. It's a revolution. You round up the ruling class and seize their wealth and give it back to the masses that produced it.

I know "that'll never happen". Said every person throughout history just before a revolution.

[-] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The wealth redistribution wouldn't solve this particular problem though. If the ecological footprint of a quadrillionaire's wealth is giant spaceships, mega yachts, private jets, data centers and fuel for all of it then it doesn't matter who owns them. The ecological damage will always happen unless that wealth is disposed of or massively downcycled.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think you are assuming the destructive effects of "wealth" are constant. This is not at all reasonable. 1 million people being able to afford shelter, healthcare, and food is not comparable to the unnecessary destruction we see today brought about by datacenters, private jets, super yachts, wars for the capitalist military industrial complex, etc, etc. Those absurdities do not exist without a concentration of wealth.

Maybe I am misunderstanding what you are saying? But, "wealth" does not have the linear relationship with the negative outcomes that you are implying. It is very much the concentration of wealth and power that results in these outcomes. The destructive power wealth has grows exponentially with its concentration in fewer and fewer hands. Simply because as it concentrates the wealthy are able to both cause the destruction AND avoid their consequences at the same time.

[-] Zahtu@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

also - rich people being scared of the masses and consequences will likely contribute to them well-behaving

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Zahtu@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

sure, some may, but not all can - especially considering the rich people from the local nationalities. E.g. the Aldi Brothers or Schwarz Family will certainly draw a lot oft anger from the populace when that happens. Also they are not able to move out most oft their assets out of the country when it happens, making them vulnerable to national confiscations/limiting access.

so - long story short - better to try and only get limited result than not trying and getting no result at all

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
79 points (77.2% liked)

World News

57561 readers
1322 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS