you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

RFC3339 is better than ISO8601 since it doesn't allow some of the esoteric formats, and allows some useful formats that ISO8601 doesn't (like separating date and time by a space instead of by T)

For example, 2026-W32-1 is also a valid ISO8601 date: Monday on the 32nd week of 2026. That format isn't allowed with RFC3339.

https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Damn it I forgot about the duration part of ISO 8601 (which is also super useful and I love it). I'll amend it to RFC 3339 to be more exact in what I mean (even though the specified format should prevent the more esoteric formats).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments