I'm interested in your perspective. I'm confident in my own path. Like, "true nature of God and reality" has at least 10 philosophical concepts I would need to be made very concrete in order to "convince me." I consider myself a practitioner of critical pedagogy, which is the antithesis of framing of one teacher "depositing" knowledge into an other student, described as the "banking" method of education by Paulo Friere.
So you can share your perspective and I'll engage in good faith because I appreciate a wild human spirit more than I insist upon a totalized ontology.
But if your objective is for you to teach, and for me to learn, for each of us to take on these specific hierarchical roles, I promise I will be an incredibly frustrating student. I've identified some tendencies in some of your comments that I might disagree with strongly. but if we are just sharing views, then I'm curious and engaged.
Also, FYI None of these down votes are from me, if that matters. I don't do that.