you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

Also tbf, rational numbers are just the lattice modded out by the equivalence relations (a, b) ~ (c, d) iff ad = bc, and the equivalence classes just happen to form an ordered field. If you show an undergrad math/science student this esoteric definition of rationals, the motivation of "2D numbers" makes a lot more sense. Of course, please don't show this to an elementary or middle schooler, a high schooler might be able to handle this if they're passionate about math.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Of course, please don’t show this to an elementary or middle schooler, a high schooler might be able to handle this if they’re passionate about math.

    Lol, I was thinking this as I was reading.

    The neat thing about complex numbers defined this way is that you don't need to understand quotient spaces because under addition ℂ is already isomorphic to ℝ²!

  • source
  • parent