you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 2 months ago (8 children)

"Felony Eavesdropping" is that like "Ninja'ing With Intent to Distribute"?

I mean, if we're just making up obviously bullshit charges now...

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Were they working at the time? Do LAPD officers wear body cams? Seems like law enforcement officers, at least while working, should reasonably expect to be recorded all the time, which would be implied consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    You're right (and it's great to see someone that understands implied consent) but they're absolutely going to make him fight for it. Meaning that if the goal is to discourage the behavior, they'll charge anyway and let the defense attorney argue it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    I hate that 12 states are all-party consent. If you're part of a conversation you should be allowed to record it, and 38 states agree.

    I went to jail after being falsely charged with assault and it was only my recordings of our conversations that saved my ass. To think in California I could have been charged with a felony for providing evidence my accuser was a scheming liar is crazy to me.

  • source
  • parent