▲ 324 ▼ Ratio (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 month ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/murderedbywords@feddit.uk 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] itrealgood@mander.xyz 25 points 1 month ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 month ago (2 children) Get significantly more reaction/likes/upvotes to your reply than their original comment did. Greater ratio of likes vs them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) My understanding is that it’s the original comment’s retweet/reply ratio. At least it used to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago Originally, yes; but language evolves. Additionally, some people will attempt to "ratio" a tweet themselves. This entails a person showing up under a disagreeable tweet and betting that their post will receive more favorable statistics than the original post. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago Yes, but IMO the comments need to be at odds. I wouldn't consider your reply here a 'ratio'. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago That's when the reply gets more updoots than the OP it replied to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago what people haven't mentioned, I don't think, is the original intent of the phrase to "get ratio'd" was to have more people reply to your tweet than like it. As it's significantly more effort to write a reply than to hit like it usually indicated the person had said something foolish and people were rushing to correct them rather than simply like the tweet permalink fedilink source parent [–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) to get more likes, it originated with g*mers in the context of kills/deaths ratios or something like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children) Why do you censor "gamers"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago it's an annoying affectation some liberals have picked up that minimizes the censoring of certain triggering terms, probably on tumblr. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) gamer = someone that plays games g*mer = permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago What? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Popularity contest. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago Twitter substitute for downvotes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 month ago (2 children) Get significantly more reaction/likes/upvotes to your reply than their original comment did. Greater ratio of likes vs them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) My understanding is that it’s the original comment’s retweet/reply ratio. At least it used to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago Originally, yes; but language evolves. Additionally, some people will attempt to "ratio" a tweet themselves. This entails a person showing up under a disagreeable tweet and betting that their post will receive more favorable statistics than the original post. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago Yes, but IMO the comments need to be at odds. I wouldn't consider your reply here a 'ratio'. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) My understanding is that it’s the original comment’s retweet/reply ratio. At least it used to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago Originally, yes; but language evolves. Additionally, some people will attempt to "ratio" a tweet themselves. This entails a person showing up under a disagreeable tweet and betting that their post will receive more favorable statistics than the original post. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago Originally, yes; but language evolves. Additionally, some people will attempt to "ratio" a tweet themselves. This entails a person showing up under a disagreeable tweet and betting that their post will receive more favorable statistics than the original post. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago Yes, but IMO the comments need to be at odds. I wouldn't consider your reply here a 'ratio'. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago That's when the reply gets more updoots than the OP it replied to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago what people haven't mentioned, I don't think, is the original intent of the phrase to "get ratio'd" was to have more people reply to your tweet than like it. As it's significantly more effort to write a reply than to hit like it usually indicated the person had said something foolish and people were rushing to correct them rather than simply like the tweet permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) to get more likes, it originated with g*mers in the context of kills/deaths ratios or something like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children) Why do you censor "gamers"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago it's an annoying affectation some liberals have picked up that minimizes the censoring of certain triggering terms, probably on tumblr. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) gamer = someone that plays games g*mer = permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago What? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children) Why do you censor "gamers"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago it's an annoying affectation some liberals have picked up that minimizes the censoring of certain triggering terms, probably on tumblr. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) gamer = someone that plays games g*mer = permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago What? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago it's an annoying affectation some liberals have picked up that minimizes the censoring of certain triggering terms, probably on tumblr. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) gamer = someone that plays games g*mer = permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago What? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago Twitter substitute for downvotes permalink fedilink source parent