you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

monopolies are not the only end result of capitalism, they are a common end result but if the barriers to enter the market are low enough and the incumbent corps don't engage in regulatory capture it generally doesn't happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    On a long enough timeline it ends with a single company.

    Because of vertical integration and a large company's ability to operate at a loss in a specific slice to drive out any competition so they can raise prices.

    If you have questions I can try to explain further.

    If you're just going to keep saying wrong things, I'm going to quickly get tired of explaining and just leave you to be wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    look at farms and how you can get tomatoes from a large number of suppliers, if the number of suppliers goes down anyone can become a new supplier.

    Not every supplier needs to be competitive on price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    No...

    More Perfect Union have some good videos on that.

    A small producer can't meet contract requirements for commercial grocery stores and can't just sell tomatoes individually.

    But like I said if you're just going to spout uninformed opinions and hope someone takes pity and attempts to explain it to you, you're gonna have to find someone else, I won't even see any other false statements you make, so there's no way I can point out all the ways you're wrong again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment