you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 65 points 2 months ago* (21 children)

I believe this design breaks down once you prepare an ingredient that then gets split for use in two or more later steps.

But now I'm thinking which kind of diagram could be used as well. Some adaption of an UML activity diagram maybe?

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Or if any of the steps requires a more complicated instruction that can't be expressed in a few words. It wouldn't break the structure of the diagram, but it wouldn't be as beautiful.

    It is a fun idea though, maybe there is another format that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    This diagram is classic "engineer developing a solution for a problem that doesn't exist in a domain they don't understand"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The diagram does have benefits. For example it shows which steps can be performed in parallel if multiple people are cooking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I don't need a diagram to do that but maybe my experience is atypical

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Similarly, it also easily identifies which part of the recipe each ingredient goes to. You can do this by splitting up the ingredients list as well, but that doesn't really go against it being a good idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm a software "engineer" and also passionate about cooking. Both are arts. You can't reduce it to an algorithm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Create a separate card for that ingredient, and in the main card list "add X% of "

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Can't an ingredient be there twice?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    But you want to do the first phase together

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I ran into this exact issue when I was making these diagrams for my own recipes: https://git.tilde.town/gamerdonkey/recipes_for_engineers#known-issues . My workaround was just to have instructions to set some aside and use it later.

    I find this layout works best for in-the-moment reference while cooking, and the 2-dimensional nature of it is what really makes it useful. So I think of splitting an ingredient as like lifting some of it out into an imaginary third dimension before inserting it later at another step.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment