▲ 200 ▼ Signal is working on registration without a phone number. But what form will it take? (aboutsignal.com) submitted 2 months ago by unglueclass23@programming.dev to c/privacy@programming.dev 74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago (24 children) didn’t they announce this like five years ago permalink fedilink source hideshow 24 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 2 months ago (22 children) At this point, if it’s on a phone app, it probably doesn’t matter. They have your number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (20 children) It's not entirely dystopian (just barely), we have newer messengers like SimpleX and DeltaChat (I/we use Delta) on the up and coming which deliver on all the same e2ee promises as Signal. It's just network effects as usual, getting people to try is the real hurdle. What they share in common (mostly) is the architecture - they're built natively decentralized, utilizing caching relays with no single source of truth, or device of truth, to be used to create a profile of you like a phone number does. Encryption keys owned by the user and no single servers. Generally this is the Nostr design as well, so we have 3 different teams all focusing on the same natively decentralized architecture patterns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] vanillama@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (15 children) Is any of these apps good for phone calls or video calls, or just text messages? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) At this rate Canada would probably ban anything they can't get records from eventually if it got popular enough. I hate this timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) And Canada is supposed to be “the good guys”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) I started self-hosting xmpp recently, and the calls work perfectly! You don't need to self-host either, there are plenty of public servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) I tried XMPP but could not find a client that let me have a "video call" where I could share my screen without also needing a webcam. Or even have a video call where not everyone is forced to have a video flux. As far as I can tell an audio call cannot be turned into a video call for 1 streamer. Like in Discord where one want to share its screen while playing. XNPP was my biggest hope to replace Discord with my friend but I either did not find the correct client or the ecosystem is not mature enough (or oriented in the direction I expected). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (5 children) Delta has it native. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent [–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Don't forget Briar! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago Briar fits into it's own niche (operational design), making it a choice for certain activities but not what I would call your general normie chat app. It makes tradeoffs (using the local network, no caching relays, etc.) to increase security posture at the expense of general use. IIRC, Jack Dorsey's BitChat was modeled after the same designs? (which is interesting, because Nostr his other pet doesn't) permalink fedilink source parent [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Simplex is a dog though compared to Signal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago I haven't tried SimpleX yet, as they can't share the same profile to multiple devices (it's explained in detail in the FAQ) which makes it a normie usability deal killer. I've heard it has really bad battery life on mobile too, but that's just reading random comments. Right now we're using Delta (and running a relay) and it's just fine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* No, apps (at least on Android) require a specific permission to read your phone number. The phone capabilities of Signal go through their own VoIP service, not your phone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TobuscusLover2001@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago I mean, they also were developing usernames five years ago AFAIK. Adding usernames for everyone was the hard, but necessary step they finally managed to do. Only now is it possible to make accounts that are discoverable AND aren't tethered to phone numbers. I'm assuming with passkeys/TOTP(?) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 2 months ago (22 children) At this point, if it’s on a phone app, it probably doesn’t matter. They have your number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (20 children) It's not entirely dystopian (just barely), we have newer messengers like SimpleX and DeltaChat (I/we use Delta) on the up and coming which deliver on all the same e2ee promises as Signal. It's just network effects as usual, getting people to try is the real hurdle. What they share in common (mostly) is the architecture - they're built natively decentralized, utilizing caching relays with no single source of truth, or device of truth, to be used to create a profile of you like a phone number does. Encryption keys owned by the user and no single servers. Generally this is the Nostr design as well, so we have 3 different teams all focusing on the same natively decentralized architecture patterns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] vanillama@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (15 children) Is any of these apps good for phone calls or video calls, or just text messages? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) At this rate Canada would probably ban anything they can't get records from eventually if it got popular enough. I hate this timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) And Canada is supposed to be “the good guys”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) I started self-hosting xmpp recently, and the calls work perfectly! You don't need to self-host either, there are plenty of public servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) I tried XMPP but could not find a client that let me have a "video call" where I could share my screen without also needing a webcam. Or even have a video call where not everyone is forced to have a video flux. As far as I can tell an audio call cannot be turned into a video call for 1 streamer. Like in Discord where one want to share its screen while playing. XNPP was my biggest hope to replace Discord with my friend but I either did not find the correct client or the ecosystem is not mature enough (or oriented in the direction I expected). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (5 children) Delta has it native. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent [–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Don't forget Briar! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago Briar fits into it's own niche (operational design), making it a choice for certain activities but not what I would call your general normie chat app. It makes tradeoffs (using the local network, no caching relays, etc.) to increase security posture at the expense of general use. IIRC, Jack Dorsey's BitChat was modeled after the same designs? (which is interesting, because Nostr his other pet doesn't) permalink fedilink source parent [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Simplex is a dog though compared to Signal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago I haven't tried SimpleX yet, as they can't share the same profile to multiple devices (it's explained in detail in the FAQ) which makes it a normie usability deal killer. I've heard it has really bad battery life on mobile too, but that's just reading random comments. Right now we're using Delta (and running a relay) and it's just fine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* No, apps (at least on Android) require a specific permission to read your phone number. The phone capabilities of Signal go through their own VoIP service, not your phone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mote@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (20 children) It's not entirely dystopian (just barely), we have newer messengers like SimpleX and DeltaChat (I/we use Delta) on the up and coming which deliver on all the same e2ee promises as Signal. It's just network effects as usual, getting people to try is the real hurdle. What they share in common (mostly) is the architecture - they're built natively decentralized, utilizing caching relays with no single source of truth, or device of truth, to be used to create a profile of you like a phone number does. Encryption keys owned by the user and no single servers. Generally this is the Nostr design as well, so we have 3 different teams all focusing on the same natively decentralized architecture patterns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] vanillama@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (15 children) Is any of these apps good for phone calls or video calls, or just text messages? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) At this rate Canada would probably ban anything they can't get records from eventually if it got popular enough. I hate this timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) And Canada is supposed to be “the good guys”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) I started self-hosting xmpp recently, and the calls work perfectly! You don't need to self-host either, there are plenty of public servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) I tried XMPP but could not find a client that let me have a "video call" where I could share my screen without also needing a webcam. Or even have a video call where not everyone is forced to have a video flux. As far as I can tell an audio call cannot be turned into a video call for 1 streamer. Like in Discord where one want to share its screen while playing. XNPP was my biggest hope to replace Discord with my friend but I either did not find the correct client or the ecosystem is not mature enough (or oriented in the direction I expected). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (5 children) Delta has it native. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent [–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Don't forget Briar! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago Briar fits into it's own niche (operational design), making it a choice for certain activities but not what I would call your general normie chat app. It makes tradeoffs (using the local network, no caching relays, etc.) to increase security posture at the expense of general use. IIRC, Jack Dorsey's BitChat was modeled after the same designs? (which is interesting, because Nostr his other pet doesn't) permalink fedilink source parent [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Simplex is a dog though compared to Signal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago I haven't tried SimpleX yet, as they can't share the same profile to multiple devices (it's explained in detail in the FAQ) which makes it a normie usability deal killer. I've heard it has really bad battery life on mobile too, but that's just reading random comments. Right now we're using Delta (and running a relay) and it's just fine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vanillama@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (15 children) Is any of these apps good for phone calls or video calls, or just text messages? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) At this rate Canada would probably ban anything they can't get records from eventually if it got popular enough. I hate this timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) And Canada is supposed to be “the good guys”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) I started self-hosting xmpp recently, and the calls work perfectly! You don't need to self-host either, there are plenty of public servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) I tried XMPP but could not find a client that let me have a "video call" where I could share my screen without also needing a webcam. Or even have a video call where not everyone is forced to have a video flux. As far as I can tell an audio call cannot be turned into a video call for 1 streamer. Like in Discord where one want to share its screen while playing. XNPP was my biggest hope to replace Discord with my friend but I either did not find the correct client or the ecosystem is not mature enough (or oriented in the direction I expected). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (5 children) Delta has it native. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) At this rate Canada would probably ban anything they can't get records from eventually if it got popular enough. I hate this timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) And Canada is supposed to be “the good guys”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) And Canada is supposed to be “the good guys”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago no good guys out there as state actors, some are the "lesser evil" and we all have to live somewhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago They have great PR, but other than that no, unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) I started self-hosting xmpp recently, and the calls work perfectly! You don't need to self-host either, there are plenty of public servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) I tried XMPP but could not find a client that let me have a "video call" where I could share my screen without also needing a webcam. Or even have a video call where not everyone is forced to have a video flux. As far as I can tell an audio call cannot be turned into a video call for 1 streamer. Like in Discord where one want to share its screen while playing. XNPP was my biggest hope to replace Discord with my friend but I either did not find the correct client or the ecosystem is not mature enough (or oriented in the direction I expected). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zykino@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) I tried XMPP but could not find a client that let me have a "video call" where I could share my screen without also needing a webcam. Or even have a video call where not everyone is forced to have a video flux. As far as I can tell an audio call cannot be turned into a video call for 1 streamer. Like in Discord where one want to share its screen while playing. XNPP was my biggest hope to replace Discord with my friend but I either did not find the correct client or the ecosystem is not mature enough (or oriented in the direction I expected). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, screensharing is not a thing in most clients, but I think it's a matter of time (years?) before it's properly implemented. In the meantime, you can use jitsi meet? Not sure if it covers your use case. I'll just copy this reddit comment, which has some good info: Yes, it’s possible, but with some limitations. For video calls between a Linux and a Windows client using ejabberd, you need an XMPP client that supports WebRTC. Some options: • Dino (Linux) – Supports video calls but no screen sharing. • Gajim (Linux/Windows) – Can do video calls with plugins, but no screen sharing. • Jitsi (XMPP mode) – Supports WebRTC and screen sharing but requires a separate Jitsi server. Since most XMPP clients don’t natively support screen sharing, you have two main options: 1. Use Jitsi Meet, which integrates with XMPP and allows both video calls and screen sharing. 2. Use OBS VirtualCam (on Windows) to share the screen as a “camera” in a video call. If you want a fully functional setup with both video calls and screen sharing, setting up Jitsi Meet with ejabberd is the best approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zykino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago An XMPP client embedding jitsi meet or having a plugin for it could be an option. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (5 children) Delta has it native. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (5 children) Delta has it native. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vanillama@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) I think it is. I don't remember seeing it before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago It's been in DC for a few versions now, we've used a combination of: macOS desktop, Android mobile, Linux desktop, iOS Mobile - and haven't had problems more than usual getting apps access to the cam/mic on macOS. They just dropped DC 2.57.0, it hit F-Droid and Arch repos in my morning updates. An update to the relay code was also dropped, 1.12.0, for relay operators. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Don't forget Briar! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago Briar fits into it's own niche (operational design), making it a choice for certain activities but not what I would call your general normie chat app. It makes tradeoffs (using the local network, no caching relays, etc.) to increase security posture at the expense of general use. IIRC, Jack Dorsey's BitChat was modeled after the same designs? (which is interesting, because Nostr his other pet doesn't) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mote@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago Briar fits into it's own niche (operational design), making it a choice for certain activities but not what I would call your general normie chat app. It makes tradeoffs (using the local network, no caching relays, etc.) to increase security posture at the expense of general use. IIRC, Jack Dorsey's BitChat was modeled after the same designs? (which is interesting, because Nostr his other pet doesn't) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Simplex is a dog though compared to Signal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago I haven't tried SimpleX yet, as they can't share the same profile to multiple devices (it's explained in detail in the FAQ) which makes it a normie usability deal killer. I've heard it has really bad battery life on mobile too, but that's just reading random comments. Right now we're using Delta (and running a relay) and it's just fine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mote@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago I haven't tried SimpleX yet, as they can't share the same profile to multiple devices (it's explained in detail in the FAQ) which makes it a normie usability deal killer. I've heard it has really bad battery life on mobile too, but that's just reading random comments. Right now we're using Delta (and running a relay) and it's just fine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* No, apps (at least on Android) require a specific permission to read your phone number. The phone capabilities of Signal go through their own VoIP service, not your phone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TobuscusLover2001@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago I mean, they also were developing usernames five years ago AFAIK. Adding usernames for everyone was the hard, but necessary step they finally managed to do. Only now is it possible to make accounts that are discoverable AND aren't tethered to phone numbers. I'm assuming with passkeys/TOTP(?) permalink fedilink source parent