Machu Picchu is an Inca settlement located in the High Andes of Peru in the Urubamba Valley, north of Cuzco. The site, perched high above the Urubamba river, has been variously described as a fortress, imperial retreat and ceremonial precinct. It was founded by Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui in c. 1450 CE, had capacity for around 1,000 residents at its peak, and ranked amongst the most sacred of all sites for the Inca. Following the collapse of the Inca empire, Machu Picchu was abandoned and forgotten, only to be rediscovered in 1911 CE by the explorer Hiram Bingham. Machu Picchu is listed by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site.

Purpose

Machu Picchu (meaning 'old hill') was an imperial estate founded by and belonging to Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui, the Inca ruler, in the mid-15th century CE. The ownership of the site was later passed to Pachacuti's successors. On its rediscovery by the explorer Hiram Bingham in 1911 CE (although local residents in the valley had always known of the site's existence) it was claimed as the last capital of the Incas. However, this proved to be untrue when the actual final capital was discovered at Vilcabamba, further downstream in the Urubamba Valley.

Another hypothesis concerning the site posed by early historians was that Machu Picchu was a fortress and the strong walls, large towers, and dry moats were cited in support of this theory. The need for fortification perhaps sprang from a series of severe droughts which made the competition for resources fierce. This would also explain why the site was not occupied for very long as when the water situation improved the necessity for such citadel sites declined.

Once again though, further study has revealed that most of the architecture was designed for religious purposes and the fortifications may well have been put in place to ensure only a select few could enter this sacred site. In further support of this interpretation, a road was discovered which linked the site to several residential settlements dotted along the valley. The most likely purpose of Machu Picchu, then, was as a sacred site, probably to the sun god Inti and with the additional purpose of reminding the recently conquered local population of the power and might of Pachacuti and the Inca empire centred at its capital Cuzco.

The site was abandoned by the Inca shortly before Pizarro and the Spanish conquistadors arrived. The invaders never reached Machu Picchu, though, and the site would remain unknown to the wider world for 400 years.

Full Article by Mark Cartwright https://www.worldhistory.org/Machu_Picchu/

From UNESCO https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/274/

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

Financial Support to the Bearsite

Machu Picchu
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hey y'all, I got into an argument with a white lib about how they think China is colonizing Africa (lmao) and how europe is no longer colonizing or exploiting any global south countries after they said some extremely braindead takes about the us-israeli war of aggression against Iran, I'm currently far from home and my internet connection isn't the best so if anybody could help me with any resources I could show her (she was open minded) I'd appreciate it a lot!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Even several of the liberal magazines/papers have disproven this, or at least have taken a position which isn't as nonsensical as your average liberal whose worldview is tenuous recollections of various headlines. These are split between the debt trap/imperialism/colonialism question, but are relevant since all those claims tie into one another.

    Here is the Atlantic for example: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2021/02/china-debt-trap-diplomacy/617953/

    Jason Hickel has this to say (Hickel is a serious academic btw, not one if the endless substack writers pulling things out of their ass): https://jasonhickel.substack.com/p/is-china-doing-colonialism-in-africa

    And there was a good article by Minqi-Li (who is not uncritically pro china--he criticizes china from the left) in Monthly Review: https://monthlyreview.org/articles/china-imperialism-or-semi-periphery/

    There is tons of info on this out there, and you can almost guarantee that when a liberal says "China is doing [bad thing] to [overexploited country]" you can do a simple search to find that country owes way more money to one of the imperialist countries with worse terms than what China provides. Not like China does this out of some kind of pure altruism, but African countries developing benefits China in several ways it does not benefit the West.

    As for western colonialism, etc., look up "neocolonialism". You can also look into how institutions like the IMF and World Bank exert a kind of imperial control over these countries. Michael Hudson deals with this in a lot of his work. Not to mention the sheer number of western mining companies operating in Africa with an endless list of human rights abuses.

    There is an ok book titled Imperialism in the 21st Century by John Smith. He isn't pro china, but he gives a decent account of how western imperialism functions via the market. Even just the first chapter of that book on the production, shipping and sale of a t-shirt is a good way to see how exploitation in the global south makes not only western capitalists rich via super profits, but the western states themselves raking in more money per tshirt from taxes alone than the factory that produces them sees per unit. Western welfare is predicted on this exploitative relationship, not so in China.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment