1257
Moving in the right direction
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
1257 points (95.5% liked)
Fuck AI
7748 readers
761 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Look mate, all i am saying is that cutting edge technology shouldnt be used for critical areas until it is proven safe, i really am not invested enough in the cenversation to continue this thread, i support the descision being made to restrict LLM use for these areas at this point in time.
LLMs have been linked to mental health impacts, specifically demonstrably in suicide cases (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_linked_to_chatbots) and i do believe in a lot of these cases the LLMs caused greater harm than would have been presented without the LLM interference, and definitely less harm than if these people saw a human professional to talk about their issues rather than a program. Yes there is a cost of seeing a health professional but this is not a case of 'somethings better than nothing'.
I do think that helps clear it up for me and helps me understand the disconnect we're having. If you're done don't let this pressure you into responding, but I'm responding for the sake of trying to resolve the difference in perspective.
We agree that there are real harms from this technology. We agree that human professionals are, on average, significantly better especially within the context of healthcare.
We disagree on what "safe" means. I am coming from the perspective that there is no such thing. There will always be side effects irregardless of the domain, technology, intervention, etc. and so the question is does it do more harm than good?
I do not see a single instance among that list, or others, that isn't just a blatant failure of existing healthcare and social systems. Without ascribing supernatural social powers to this technology I fail to see how the LLM usage is anything more than a symptom of those institutional failures.
Legislating away access will do nothing more than give the monopoly power to the same institutions responsible for the initial failure and the initial conditions that led to that point while providing them with a scapegoat.