you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

His party affiliation has nothing to do with it.Trump has always been a POS human being full stop.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    For you. I see Dems constantly glazing Obama. Who, while not as bad as trump, was pretty fucking bad in a "it's like Bush never left" kind of way. Affiliation is all that matters to a stunning number of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    “it’s like Bush never left”

    What's that based on?

    And saying he's "not as bad as Trump" is a ludicrous understatement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    What's that based on?

    He ordered almost 600 drone strikes in 7 different countries, hitting weddings schools and hospitals and killing scores of civilians. He renewed the patriot act, escalated the domestic spying program, maintained the CIA black site torture program, and persecuted the whistleblowers that told us about them. That's what "hope and change" looks like apparently. And the Dems went completely silent. "No blood for oil" turned into "awww he's charasmatic and plays basketball <3"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm pointing out blind partisanism isn't exclusive to one party. Pretending that it is exclusive to one party is an example of blind partisanism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Uh ya no. What you're doing is the most typical argument tactic maga/repubs employ. Oh what about that guy that one time that isn't in power anymore more, he did a thing so its fine for us to do this now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It's the same exact "it's ok when my guy does it" attitude that led to trump. This isn't a Republican problem. It's an American problem. We're not going to solve it by only focusing on half of the people doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    But yet here you are, what about Obama glazing. He's not president. He's not running again. Sure some people still glaze, most people don't give or shit or know alot of what he did. We legit just turned the entire world against the US and swept a pedo ring under the rug. So wattaboutism the glazing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    So we should ignore half the people putting party above policy and pretend that this is only a Republican phenomenon. Surely that's the way to fix it. Ok blue maga.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I never said such. I said youre a hypocrite. I said you're playing whataboutism, then you took a step back, and you went what about, what about, what about. Let summarize for you

    You "WHATTTABOUT OBAMA GETIN GLAZED? ME, "WHATABOUTISM ISNT" YOU "OH SO WERE SUPPOSED TO JUST PRETEND DEMS ARE PURE"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    What I said was "Dems aren't immune to this behavior, and here's an example that proves it". You are inadvertantly providing another example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Must be easy having such a narrow view of the world, only able to comprehend criticizing one group at a time. You'd make a good maga.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Okay, you really don't get it. The same shit that caused your whattabout Obama drone striking, is the same shit that allows trump to get away with all this shit. It's not whattabout its the same shit, abuse of powers, too much leniency and power for that position. You keep trying to divide that problem, into a team game. If you wanna play whattabout, whattabout which president didn't commit a warcrime? You'd have to go back like 50 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    You're making it a team game. I'm saying that both teams do awful shit that their bases ignore, and this is a problem inherent to the system and the way psychology works. You're turning it into a team game by chastising me for criticizing the "wrong team".

  • source
  • parent