💯

It's assimilation to a system rather than a rejection to change it.

I hate to say it, but your argument is just about assimilation to a system and working within it. You've already succumbed to fear and are attempting to be accepted, working within the boundaries of the corporation rather than trying to affect change.

Boycotting with a small window, isn't the whole war, it's just one shot fired. It gives them an idea of the numbers involved, the amount of people who disagree with their policy, and an idea we won't just forget and roll over.

Why must we "give them an idea." Just do what you say in the very next line:

It's got to effect their bottom line, or they will ignore it.

Don't announce an ending to it. Your idea of "let's fire one shot, and another, and another" is an assimilation tactic within the system, not revolutionary and really only succeeds in exhausting those who seek to fight back.

People who entirely abstain are just measured as not in the argument at all. You don't give them pressure by never owning a PlayStation. You just aren't a customer. They count customers.

If they have less customers, does that not affect the bottom line? If they have less customers, and less capture of new customers, is that not...less customers? Therefore less potential ad delivery, less potential to purchase on the storefront, all leading to a lower bottom line?

It would even be worthwhile to create a PlayStation account, log in the day before the boycott, and log out for the duration, then log in again the day after the end, so you have a measurable voice in the movement.

Delete your account. By your same logic above, this would be the most devastating to their bottom line. Not only would they lose customer count, but they lose retention. Logging back in shows that they have nothing to worry about. It looks performative rather than a rejection of the systems in place. Deleted accounts are more powerful than people going on vacation for a week. I promise you that that doesn't even register within account tracking and finance systems.

If you went to their offices, you would just look clinically unhinged, and they would just involve police, and ignore you.

Sounds like you still fear them and aren't willing to show true resolve. You're conceding before you've even done anything. Why is it "clinically unhinged" to exercise a first amendment right? It's the first amendment for a reason. Showing up en masse to peacefully protest would do more than "logging out for a week." That's just a vacation. That is where time should be spent by organizers, instead.of organizing 23 weeklong boycotts across the next 2 years, organize a protest and help folks get there with a cohesive message and demands. And, arguably, executives should be scared. They use fear against us all the time, fear we'll lose our purchases, fear we'll lose our jobs, our healthcare. The point of a protest, the point of a boycott, is to remind them who holds the power.