you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

I heard similar; That this was the result of a migration away from Googles storage, which was cut off before they had the replacement fully set up. So they lost a ton of data and are severely limited in what they can display.

This is just what I've heard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    It's not a result of Google storage. Google served only for data analysis and batch jobs. These would not be sufficient enough to cause service degradation. Just a bad launch of a feature (via server side) that had unintended consequences.

  • source
  • parent