49
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bluGill@fedia.io 0 points 20 hours ago

Marx is one of a long string of 'experts' that don't value work that isn't obviously the result of working with hands. Mind work is very important

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 16 hours ago

Never said it wasn't. I don't think he did either.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You are deeply misinformed or perhaps intentionally misleading re: your characterization of Marx's ideas. Marx's theories on mental labor appear in his earliest works, and continue through his later, more developed ones:

labour-power or capacity for labour is to be understood the aggregate of those mental and physical capabilities existing in a human being, which he exercises whenever he produces a use-value of any description.

Capital V1, chapter 6 -- where Marx defines labor power

Your characterization of Marx's ideas, that he is creating artificial divisions between different kinds of labor, is in fact a tendency of capitalism that Marx identified and criticized at great length.

[-] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

Liberals will not read Capital and then say Marx didn't consider something he explicitly covered in Capital.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
49 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1689 readers
76 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS