this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026

590 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

nottheonion@lemmy.world

22,714 readers

6,720 active

16 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

moderators

kescusay@lemmy.world

ISPs' long nightmare of having to list all the fees they charge is finally over (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 months ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

pringles can would work okay for 5ghz but making feed element for that band would be hard without expensive test equipment

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

NanoVNA's are pretty cheap for ~$100-200, though that being said I've only looked at them for ~1GHz work

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

I've got one sitting by my TV, haven't ever used it. I'll fiddle with it today to see how high it can measure.

parent

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 1 point 2 months ago

some variants go above 2.4GHz but going over 5GHz is entirely different thing

parent