326

On Friday, a three‑judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously paused a lower‑court injunction that had temporarily blocked the USPS from finalising and enforcing the new ballot‑delivery rule.

The rule would permit the Postal Service to withhold delivery of mail‑in and absentee ballots where state officials decline to send certain voter data to federal authorities. In practice, that sets up a confrontation between states determined to guard sensitive voter information and a federal agency now claiming it cannot guarantee accurate ballot delivery without it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I honestly don't know why the GOP are attacking mail-in ballots. I would guess the majority of mail-in ballot users are established older adults, a demographic that usually leans more red. If the GOP is successful in stopping mail-in ballots, won't a higher percentage of their own voters be blocked from voting for the GOP?

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

First, republicans will still vote by mail, just like Trump himself does. Democrats think that they will somehow be embarrassed by the hypocrisy. Republicans don't care. They know it's just a tactic.

The point of all this anti mail-in ballots rhetoric is to give them control over the votes. It's just another reason they can use to discard some of them. They will have 0 issues applying some rules to votes from Democratic areas and ignoring those rules in Republican districts. It's hard for them to insert themselves in the vote counting process of in-person votes in Democratic districts and manipulate the results. With mail-in votes it's possible. This is what they are doing.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Mail-in ballots are their own paper trail. Not only can they not be fucked with, they can be used to demonstrate electronic fuckery in the rest of the same election.

Every mail-in ballot (and early vote) is much harder to account for and manipulate when it comes to fucking an election as a whole. And they've been doing this since electronic voting was a thing. If you haven't yet, you should definitely read Vanity Fair's The Path to Florida which is a dissection of the Bush v. Gore fight in Florida. Be sure to note the negative 16,000 votes in Volusia County.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's not about actually stopping mail-in ballots. It's about gaining an advantage in other ways. If they lose in the courts, they will claim that mail-in ballots were illegitimate in areas where Dems won. If they win, they will say that Republican areas don't have the funds to change their voting method away from mail-in votes, so they get a reprieve. Also if they win, they hope to get access to voter lists in Dem areas to throw out votes.

As far as who votes by mail, that is a wash. In some states, EVERYONE votes by mail. Those states are both Republican and Democrat. In other states, the people who vote by mail can be anyone from old people, people who can't take off work, college kids who can't get back to their state to vote, military members, expats who live overseas, etc.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

I honestly don't know why the GOP are attacking mail-in ballots.

It looks like it's more-or-less a wash in historical data:

https://politicalscience.byu.edu/2020/08/28/do-republicans-or-democrats-benefit-from-mail-in-voting-it-turns-out-neither-three-decades-of-voting-history-reveals-vote-by-mail-does-not-give-either-party-an-edge/

Do Republicans or Democrats benefit from mail-in voting? It turns out, neither: Three decades of voting history reveals vote-by-mail does not give either party an edge

You might be able to intimidate voters or pull some other stunts locally that you cna't do remotely.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
326 points (99.7% liked)

News

38447 readers
1927 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS