▲ 347 ▼ No AI List - List of projects that have specifically chosen not to use AI (noailist.org) submitted 2 months ago by stuartml@piefed.social to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 53 comments fedilink hide all child comments Just launched: https://noailist.org/ - support projects that don't use AI. This is a website that will be a list of projects that have specifically chosen not to use AI. Submit your project today.
[–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 9 points 2 months ago (12 children) Any sources could help direct the future of the project permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (11 children) could you specify what exactly you mean by that? i don't understand your reply, sorry about that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 8 points 2 months ago* (10 children) Sure, ghost may be listed as dirty on that website, but there are no links to actual evidence, despite it being listed as cited, if there are credible citations I would consider building this project away from ghost. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago Soooo, if there are no sources for it why is it labeled dirty? Can I just go in and label everything in existence as dirty and then it's on others to make the effort to defend it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Is telling new hires they will get access to the latest AI tools acceptable as evidence? "💻 Hardware A brand new MacBook Pro + a budget for office setup and the latest AI tools." https://careers.ghost.org/staff-product-engineer/en This is the first entry for Ghost. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (6 children) I also thought their weren't sources on that site a few days ago. Click on "view citation" now click on the very small text up next to or just below the date. Its not very obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) The view citation has no supporting evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (4 children) Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago Build it with Fable 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derbolle@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (11 children) could you specify what exactly you mean by that? i don't understand your reply, sorry about that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 8 points 2 months ago* (10 children) Sure, ghost may be listed as dirty on that website, but there are no links to actual evidence, despite it being listed as cited, if there are credible citations I would consider building this project away from ghost. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago Soooo, if there are no sources for it why is it labeled dirty? Can I just go in and label everything in existence as dirty and then it's on others to make the effort to defend it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Is telling new hires they will get access to the latest AI tools acceptable as evidence? "💻 Hardware A brand new MacBook Pro + a budget for office setup and the latest AI tools." https://careers.ghost.org/staff-product-engineer/en This is the first entry for Ghost. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (6 children) I also thought their weren't sources on that site a few days ago. Click on "view citation" now click on the very small text up next to or just below the date. Its not very obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) The view citation has no supporting evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (4 children) Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago Build it with Fable 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 8 points 2 months ago* (10 children) Sure, ghost may be listed as dirty on that website, but there are no links to actual evidence, despite it being listed as cited, if there are credible citations I would consider building this project away from ghost. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago Soooo, if there are no sources for it why is it labeled dirty? Can I just go in and label everything in existence as dirty and then it's on others to make the effort to defend it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Is telling new hires they will get access to the latest AI tools acceptable as evidence? "💻 Hardware A brand new MacBook Pro + a budget for office setup and the latest AI tools." https://careers.ghost.org/staff-product-engineer/en This is the first entry for Ghost. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (6 children) I also thought their weren't sources on that site a few days ago. Click on "view citation" now click on the very small text up next to or just below the date. Its not very obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) The view citation has no supporting evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (4 children) Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago Build it with Fable 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago Soooo, if there are no sources for it why is it labeled dirty? Can I just go in and label everything in existence as dirty and then it's on others to make the effort to defend it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Is telling new hires they will get access to the latest AI tools acceptable as evidence? "💻 Hardware A brand new MacBook Pro + a budget for office setup and the latest AI tools." https://careers.ghost.org/staff-product-engineer/en This is the first entry for Ghost. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (6 children) I also thought their weren't sources on that site a few days ago. Click on "view citation" now click on the very small text up next to or just below the date. Its not very obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) The view citation has no supporting evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (4 children) Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children) The view citation has no supporting evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (4 children) Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (4 children) Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derbolle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless. to expand on it: look at their github. there are clear signs, that genAI is actively used in the development process. Indicative are agents/skills and .claude directories https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stuartml@piefed.social [S] 1 point 1 month ago No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI. permalink fedilink source parent