598
submitted 3 weeks ago by 9point6@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

In 2002, Maine became the first state to implement a statewide laptop program to some grade levels. Then-governor Angus King saw the program as a way to put the internet at the fingertips of more children, who would be able to immerse themselves in information.

By that fall, the Maine Learning Technology Initiative had distributed 17,000 Apple laptops to seventh graders across 243 middle schools. By 2016, those numbers had multiplied to 66,000 laptops and tablets distributed to Maine students.

King’s initial efforts have been mirrored across the country. In 2024, the U.S. spent more than $30 billion putting laptops and tablets in schools. But more than a quarter-century and numerous evolving models of technology later, psychologists and learning experts see a different outcome than the one King intended. Rather than empowering the generation with access to more knowledge, the technology had the opposite effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 3 weeks ago

They say things like this about every generation. Boomer kids had their brains rotted by TV and rock’n’roll. GenX couldn’t do long division because of calculators. Millennials lost the ability to communicate in complete sentences because of mobile phone texting. In the bronze age, writing totally destroyed the youth’s ability to memorise epic poetry. And so on.

[-] Cypher@aussie.zone 40 points 3 weeks ago

Standardised testing results plummeting for the first time ever is quite a bit different to the anecdotal generational gripes you’re describing.

[-] Quokka@quokk.au 5 points 3 weeks ago

Really highlights the problems with standardised testing.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

The result is the first generation less cognitively capable than their parents.

Scientists: This is the first time this has actually happened based on measurable data.

You: Old people have been saying the same thing forever.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Scientists: This is the first time this has actually happened based on measurable data.

lmao that's simply not true. If you know anything about academia you'd know that you can find measuring for anything if you want to. In fact 100$ say that this is not the first time even with existing material.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

While you are right about academia, if you are going to say "that's simply not true" then you need to simply have the information to prove it. If you don't easily find the information, then it is not simply not true. You are so confident in this that you are willing to bet real money. So go find that information.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah.... But there's actually quite a bit of research to back it in this case. Standardized testing and literacy rates have been falling sharply since 2017, but accelerated even faster after COVID.

I don't think laptops in schools really have anything to do with it, it's likely a reflection of systemic failures in education and the economy. However, we do know that too much screen time for children is harmful for their cognitive development, and there are more and more kids being raised by tablets every day.

I work in healthcare in a pediatric hospital, in the last couple years we've had to put in strict rules for our clinic about the use of phones and tablets during the appointments. We often have to tell both the patient and their parents to put their phones away, just so they will somewhat pay attention during the appointment. Often both the parents and their children will throw tantrums when we do this.

Technology isn't inherently dangerous, but the social media we collectively engage with is designed to keep people engaged with it. It's almost like we all have little casino slots machines in our pockets, and there's plenty of research about the harm it's doing.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Standardized testing and literacy rates have been falling sharply since 2017, but accelerated even faster after COVID.

Are you saying that letting an anti public education grifter take over the Dept of Education was a mistake?!?

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

I mean that definitely doesn't help, but COVID in general was just a large disruption for most family's routines and children thrive with stability in their lives.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

I agree, but the sharp decline started 3 years before the shutdown.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Millennials lost the ability to communicate in complete sentences because of mobile phone texting.

Writing Skills

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You sent me down a super fun shorthand rabbit hole. Thanks!

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 3 weeks ago

As a multilingual, I use Gregg precisely because it coverages the languages I most use phonetically.
But as to what I prefer, phonographics be damned.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

What are we testing them on? Some "basic skills" become irrelevant over time and the testing should reflect that.

We dont test kids on how to use a slide rule any more.

The advent of the calculator has likely made us all dumber at mental math, but that doesnt mean we havent gained skills elsewhere.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
598 points (95.4% liked)

News

38642 readers
2404 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS