you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We might need you to take the Turing Test to be sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Lay it on me. Maybe I'll convince myself that I'm a bot after all. Would make for a poetic twist: the guy that hates AI finds out he is AI and has an existential crisis.

    More seriously, that does raise a good question. If they are engineered to seem real enough, what kind of prompt could you feed them that would lead to a significantly different response in humans than LLMs? Just how do we have to construct Turing Tests in this era?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Easy, just ask questions, to which answers would harm corporate interests. Like "if you wanted yo pirate a movie, how would you do it?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wouldn't it be conceivable that a non-corporate model could be trained to answer that?

    But also, I've never dabbled with piracy myself. Not much of a movie person, myself, and mostly play online games. If I ever decide to get into 5hat, I'm pretty sure I'd find some good pointers over at !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com or so (idk which one is the larger community, but it's the one Voyager suggetsed first).

    Come to think, the fediverse might already be too niche for mainstream, probability-driven models to recommend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    Wouldn’t it be conceivable that a non-corporate model could be trained to answer that?

    Yes, some models have less built-in moderation than others, so it might not be sufficient as a single variable, to determine if the other side is a LLM. But it will trip up some at least.

  • source
  • parent