853
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip to c/games@sh.itjust.works

Just in time for them to take physical discs away! Edit: This is only in EU! For now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tixooo@lemmy.zip 81 points 2 days ago

guys let me introduce you to chinese handhelds with 1351251351513 games on, your old shool consoles with physical disk, and remind you of ALL THOSE cool games you always wanted to play but had no time to do so.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

Yeah really I have no desire for new stuff. Like, why? Ive never once cared about graphics, even when I was around 8, I remember thinking people caring about graphics was stupid, because its the game that matters. Never have I bought a game because it was "shiny" or because I could see a baseball players eyelash. Who cares. I want a game, not a reality simulator (well, I do enjoy walking/ driving simulators once in a while, but not because of graphics!)

Now flashy graphics are fine and all but not at the expense of the game.

Iif I even tried completing every game from 1975 to 1999, I'd have enough play for more than a lifetime of gaming.

New really isnt that great, for me. Some good indie games here and there, sure.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

I think ps3 graphics are good enough any thing higher doesn't make me more immersed and pulling out of immersion to go "oooo pretty" is neat now and then but not that important. I'll say I do occasionally stop to be impressed by really good shadows though

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I always goto Civilization as the example. One of the best games ever before the recent versions.... No emphasis on graphics....just well balanced strategy and gameplay. Civ 3 ftw

[-] tixooo@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Graphics are all cool and all, but unless the game is great, graphics to me are worthless. I never understood people that put graphics over gameplay. Such a stupid concept. To top all you said, new games are mid at best, and shit in their usual state. Rarely a game comes out that is GOOD! I tend of playing 10+ years old games recently ... and why would I need a newer console or PC ? For what ?

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

You like walking simulators? You should try DayZ

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I have, it was too complex for me

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

It does have a bit of a learning curve but it's pretty rewarding if the gameplay clicks with you. Plus it's apparently great at modeling nature (compared to other games, that is). My lumberjack friend is constantly raving about how the trees types/placement and the forests in general are pretty realistic

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Pick a direction, walk until you die. Rinse, and repeat.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

The problem is that most of the trillions of games suck and the ones that I had heard of often aren't on there. I also wish there was some way for multiplayer, I would pay more if they figured that out for some games.

[-] tixooo@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

There is a way you put your own games. Most of those handhrlds are simple emulators that you can put whatever you like up to ps3 in some cases even (hard).

There is multiplayer. Almost all modern handheld Chinese consoles have multiplayer for many games. Look it up, they are very mature.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

There isn't on the one I have. What brand do you recommend?

[-] tixooo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Anbernic, ayeneo, motion mini, lots of options, and to be honest much more there if you dig deeper :)

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Which one has the best multiplayer platform or do they all work the same?

[-] tixooo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I cant say much. I have seen up to 4 people play different games on these platforms. Usually Anmbernic is the most popular choice, and I would personally, but look at aliexpress etc. even their official web page is more expensive than that. Again dont take my word for it, look up youtube, there are tons of videos on those. I personally like the vertical handhelds, but I know people preffer the horizontals, and they are more powerfull.

Another coice is Odin btw, that is I think one of the most powerfull handhelds, that can even run steam no problem *others can as well but with limited capabilities because of the hardware.

[-] christopher@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

The Nintendo DSi can also be made to use emulation. I play nes and snes on mine currently and also downloaded ds games

[-] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

3DS is even better for that and easier to homebrew. Gives you access to a huge library, including DS and Gameboy advance games

[-] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 2 days ago
[-] tixooo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Follow the conversation idk.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
853 points (99.1% liked)

Games

25443 readers
100 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS