858
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grandma@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago

It's definitely not ok, but when treating the root cause will take decades if not centuries (which we absolutely should still do), perhaps it makes sense to look into treating the symptoms as well

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 day ago

To my knowledge a lot of ACs can't even operate at those temperatures, or only in a degraded fashion. The optimal maximum outside temperature of mine apparently is 35°C. After that the radiator can't get rid of the heat fast enough to have the inside unit work at full capacity.

There are genius ways to build homes that get cooled down even without electricity. See the "earthship" design for example, routing fresh air through pipes in the ground where it cools down, going through the home as the hot air gets sucked out by a "thermal chimmey" (literally creates airflow by using the sun). If we combined that with good insulation to avoid the sun heating up walls and windows we'd have liveable temperatures inside even at 50°C outside. But western countries not even remotely progressive enough for such a radical but necessary structural shift, so even right now we keep building houses designed to trap heat.

[-] YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 day ago

We're gonna end up having to go with geothermal heat pumps instead of radiators trying to dump heat in +40C air. this guy modified a window unit and was surprised at how well it did. Results @49 minutes. We should also be tripling our insulation requirements to cover the next 50 to 100 years.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Just realize the hole he dug is probably the bare minimum to handle the heat load from the smallest window AC. It takes a lot of digging to cool a real AC unit. And European homes aren't known for have large yards.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You can dig straight down, and run the ground loop vertically, but it's surprisingly expensive to dig the hole. Like 15-40k expensive.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I gotta say I understand the cost. Dig a full size grave by hand some time. It's freakin exhausting. And sure, an excavator can do it in minutes, but that means you're paying for time on a very expensive machine.

[-] grandma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

There's places with district heating from back in the days that people still invested in new infrastructure. We could do the same with cooling but I'm afraid the neoliberal rot has penetrated too far at this point.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Heating is easier than cooling. For heat you just run a set of lines from the source to the homes, same as plumbing. To dump that heat into the ground, the field you need grows very quickly. A small town would need a large, and probably deep field of pipes. The cost would be huge. Geothermal is great, but digging is hard, so it's relatively expensive. Every project needs to be individually considered, to determine if it's really the way to go.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Most of downtown Toronto has been cooled by deep lake water in Lake Ontario since 2004. Cuts electricity use by 75%.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Generic residential units are designed to move heat in the ranges they are operated under. Desert units exist that could work in much hotter conditions. Systems can be made to cool way up past 50°C.

But cooling the inside of a house/car is way different than trying to farm crops/animals in that heat.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not to mention the care needed in designing and installing such a system so as to not make a mold factory.

[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Solar panels and air con are a good short-term solution for the symptoms

And by short-term I mean my whole life

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That would make the oil lobby sad though

[-] grandma@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why? Won't they just get to sell more fossil fuels to meet the electricity demand while politicians endlessly drag their feet on cheaper, renewable alternatives?

EDIT: Oh you mean treating the root cause, yeah true

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

The problem is that treating the root cause is not profitable. So it will never happen. Ever.

[-] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

That's not true. There is plenty of profit to be made with selling stuff that helps reduce energy use, selling energy that uses less fossil fuel (or produces less CO2), undercutting competition with more efficient methods, etc.

The tech world talks a big game about disruption and making billions or even trillions from it. You don't think there are people who want to make trillions disrupting fossil energy companies?

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

There is no treatment for the root cause, lol either we continue to pump co2 into the atmosphere or we stop. Either way, temperature increase is locked in for roughly a century at this point. We lost the fight for a livable planet. The human extinction event continues

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
858 points (98.8% liked)

memes

21847 readers
2670 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS