-35
Rust trojan horse (thelemmy.club)

BTW I think some anti-Rust people are more annoying than the worst Rust evangelists - seen some of them calling people not using Rust as "murderers", because "memory leakage can kill at the right time" - but that's due to them being evangelists to right-wing politics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago

I know, I read the description. It just looks like a nicer syntax around setting up a tokio runtime and sending code between runtimes. It'd still be nice to have a non-tokio options so stuff could be single threaded.

[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

A lot of the time it's not about options. It's about not messing up the async pattern.

If you have something that either:

  • requires a lot of CPU time
  • requires to run permanently, independently to the caller's future polling. Then you can spawn it on a global tokio executor.

If not, just use future polling tricks like the futures::join!() macro or a stream with .buffered(). It won't be slower. The bottle neck is IO. Not the program.

Personally I even try to replace the heavy reqwest library with ureq + blocking, and it works perfectly and compiles faster (you can see that in the api_bindium crate)

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
-35 points (34.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32102 readers
381 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS