▲ 343 ▼ Lenovo Warns PC RAM Prices Will "Never" Go Back to Normal (www.thegamer.com) submitted 3 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 3 months ago (31 children) The Chinese fabs should be producing lots of RAM by 2030. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 31 child comments replies: [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 3 months ago (7 children) Old/current ram or new ram? Probably be moving on to DDR6 then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR5 will probably stick around for a long time if DDR6 is not affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] daggermoon@piefed.world 21 points 3 months ago I'm still on DDR4 and it does what I need it to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (3 children) We could always just not, and use whatever RAM we can get. I'd rather have a thriving market with slightly worse RAM than motherboards that require a RAM no one can afford. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR2 Prices are up 60% as AI datacenters are slapping together whatever hardware they can get. There is NO affordable RAM, and this is by design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mecen@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago Nope it is for legacy systems which are not upgraded to new standard. "Of course, today’s PCs don’t use DDR2, so we’re likely to see the impact of these price increases landing in areas like embedded systems, networking equipment, industrial controllers, automotive electronics, and other long-lived devices that were designed around it and are too costly to requalify on newer memory generations like DDR4 and five." permalink fedilink source parent [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago I think these are false options. If there's a thriving market for us there's a thriving market for them permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago I'll buy DDR4 if it means I can feed my family too permalink fedilink source parent [–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago (3 children) Even if that's true, I'm predicting either AI companies just buy all of that too. Or the US government doesn't allow the import of it because it's from China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago Isn’t it all from china already? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago Sucks to be american then permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago AI won't last past 2028. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago There is literally zero incentive for companies to make ram and sell it cheap. The market is used to current prices, and by 2030 current prices will be looked at as cheap. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago I doubt that, ASML won't suddenly flood china with lithography machines. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago (16 children) China will be running out of people soon. Their birth rate has been in collapse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago 1.4 billion people will disappear in just 3 years? permalink fedilink source parent [–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (6 children) China will not collapse. It produces too many goods and its economy is too strong. Birth rates aren’t a problem to the point that they undermine manufacturing. If someone tries to tell you the story that China will collapse and they seem credible, just reach out to me. I have a bridge for sale that will help you short the Chinese collapse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -8 points 3 months ago (5 children) The problem is they modify goods, not produce them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children) Intellectual property shouldn’t exist. If China wants to “steal” ram designs and sell them for cheaper, then LeT tHe fReE mArKeT wOrK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago That’s simply not how the current economy works. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago That’s a wholly different topic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cy888@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) China makes cars that no one else can permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago They assemble cars from parts sourced externally. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 3 months ago (4 children) But they'll still have plenty of people by 2030. And if they're not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (3 children) And if they’re not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. Every Chinese book I've read screams at me nationalism and xenophobia, be it modern fantasy, 50 years old detective series or comedy. And immigration to China is - currently - heavily restricted. Like damn heavily. And you will not become a permanent resident, and there is literally 0 chance of becoming a citizen, unless you're of Han Chinese descent, preferably first generation, preferably looking Chinese, and you can't have dual nationality (from last census in 2020 about 17.000 people ever got a citizenship, which is what. 0.0012% of population? And the permanent residency in 2017 was about 10k total). My country, Poland (about 38m people), grants more than that every year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Yeah, this will probably have interesting consequences down the line, but not in 2030, and maybe not 2100 even permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) maybe not 2100 even Chinese government does not seem to agree with you, considering its: Pro natal policies Heavy research into automation being sold as "to fill in labour gaps" (even though the gig work is skyrocketing) Retirement age reforms increasing the retirement age Chinese universities also do not agree with your flippant attitude and are literally alarmist about it: Tsinghua projections (that accurately predicted peak of population) show halving the population (and that > 50% will be people over retirement age) by the year 2100: https://www.dess.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1226/2472.htm On the other hand the dude who was saying something about collapsing in 3 years also didn't knew what he was talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent [–] thetrekkersparky@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Yeah, but if they started right now I bet they could pump out some new adults inside of 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago They literally can’t. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Their birth rate is “In collapse” because they already have a gigantic population that is too big. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 3 months ago (7 children) Old/current ram or new ram? Probably be moving on to DDR6 then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR5 will probably stick around for a long time if DDR6 is not affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] daggermoon@piefed.world 21 points 3 months ago I'm still on DDR4 and it does what I need it to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (3 children) We could always just not, and use whatever RAM we can get. I'd rather have a thriving market with slightly worse RAM than motherboards that require a RAM no one can afford. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR2 Prices are up 60% as AI datacenters are slapping together whatever hardware they can get. There is NO affordable RAM, and this is by design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mecen@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago Nope it is for legacy systems which are not upgraded to new standard. "Of course, today’s PCs don’t use DDR2, so we’re likely to see the impact of these price increases landing in areas like embedded systems, networking equipment, industrial controllers, automotive electronics, and other long-lived devices that were designed around it and are too costly to requalify on newer memory generations like DDR4 and five." permalink fedilink source parent [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago I think these are false options. If there's a thriving market for us there's a thriving market for them permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago I'll buy DDR4 if it means I can feed my family too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR5 will probably stick around for a long time if DDR6 is not affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] daggermoon@piefed.world 21 points 3 months ago I'm still on DDR4 and it does what I need it to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 21 points 3 months ago I'm still on DDR4 and it does what I need it to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (3 children) We could always just not, and use whatever RAM we can get. I'd rather have a thriving market with slightly worse RAM than motherboards that require a RAM no one can afford. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR2 Prices are up 60% as AI datacenters are slapping together whatever hardware they can get. There is NO affordable RAM, and this is by design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mecen@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago Nope it is for legacy systems which are not upgraded to new standard. "Of course, today’s PCs don’t use DDR2, so we’re likely to see the impact of these price increases landing in areas like embedded systems, networking equipment, industrial controllers, automotive electronics, and other long-lived devices that were designed around it and are too costly to requalify on newer memory generations like DDR4 and five." permalink fedilink source parent [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago I think these are false options. If there's a thriving market for us there's a thriving market for them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) DDR2 Prices are up 60% as AI datacenters are slapping together whatever hardware they can get. There is NO affordable RAM, and this is by design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mecen@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago Nope it is for legacy systems which are not upgraded to new standard. "Of course, today’s PCs don’t use DDR2, so we’re likely to see the impact of these price increases landing in areas like embedded systems, networking equipment, industrial controllers, automotive electronics, and other long-lived devices that were designed around it and are too costly to requalify on newer memory generations like DDR4 and five." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago Nope it is for legacy systems which are not upgraded to new standard. "Of course, today’s PCs don’t use DDR2, so we’re likely to see the impact of these price increases landing in areas like embedded systems, networking equipment, industrial controllers, automotive electronics, and other long-lived devices that were designed around it and are too costly to requalify on newer memory generations like DDR4 and five." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago I think these are false options. If there's a thriving market for us there's a thriving market for them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago I'll buy DDR4 if it means I can feed my family too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago (3 children) Even if that's true, I'm predicting either AI companies just buy all of that too. Or the US government doesn't allow the import of it because it's from China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago Isn’t it all from china already? permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago Sucks to be american then permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago AI won't last past 2028. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago Isn’t it all from china already? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago AI won't last past 2028. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago There is literally zero incentive for companies to make ram and sell it cheap. The market is used to current prices, and by 2030 current prices will be looked at as cheap. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago I doubt that, ASML won't suddenly flood china with lithography machines. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago (16 children) China will be running out of people soon. Their birth rate has been in collapse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago 1.4 billion people will disappear in just 3 years? permalink fedilink source parent [–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (6 children) China will not collapse. It produces too many goods and its economy is too strong. Birth rates aren’t a problem to the point that they undermine manufacturing. If someone tries to tell you the story that China will collapse and they seem credible, just reach out to me. I have a bridge for sale that will help you short the Chinese collapse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -8 points 3 months ago (5 children) The problem is they modify goods, not produce them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children) Intellectual property shouldn’t exist. If China wants to “steal” ram designs and sell them for cheaper, then LeT tHe fReE mArKeT wOrK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago That’s simply not how the current economy works. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago That’s a wholly different topic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cy888@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) China makes cars that no one else can permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago They assemble cars from parts sourced externally. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 3 months ago (4 children) But they'll still have plenty of people by 2030. And if they're not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (3 children) And if they’re not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. Every Chinese book I've read screams at me nationalism and xenophobia, be it modern fantasy, 50 years old detective series or comedy. And immigration to China is - currently - heavily restricted. Like damn heavily. And you will not become a permanent resident, and there is literally 0 chance of becoming a citizen, unless you're of Han Chinese descent, preferably first generation, preferably looking Chinese, and you can't have dual nationality (from last census in 2020 about 17.000 people ever got a citizenship, which is what. 0.0012% of population? And the permanent residency in 2017 was about 10k total). My country, Poland (about 38m people), grants more than that every year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Yeah, this will probably have interesting consequences down the line, but not in 2030, and maybe not 2100 even permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) maybe not 2100 even Chinese government does not seem to agree with you, considering its: Pro natal policies Heavy research into automation being sold as "to fill in labour gaps" (even though the gig work is skyrocketing) Retirement age reforms increasing the retirement age Chinese universities also do not agree with your flippant attitude and are literally alarmist about it: Tsinghua projections (that accurately predicted peak of population) show halving the population (and that > 50% will be people over retirement age) by the year 2100: https://www.dess.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1226/2472.htm On the other hand the dude who was saying something about collapsing in 3 years also didn't knew what he was talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent [–] thetrekkersparky@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Yeah, but if they started right now I bet they could pump out some new adults inside of 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago They literally can’t. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Their birth rate is “In collapse” because they already have a gigantic population that is too big. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago 1.4 billion people will disappear in just 3 years? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (6 children) China will not collapse. It produces too many goods and its economy is too strong. Birth rates aren’t a problem to the point that they undermine manufacturing. If someone tries to tell you the story that China will collapse and they seem credible, just reach out to me. I have a bridge for sale that will help you short the Chinese collapse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -8 points 3 months ago (5 children) The problem is they modify goods, not produce them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children) Intellectual property shouldn’t exist. If China wants to “steal” ram designs and sell them for cheaper, then LeT tHe fReE mArKeT wOrK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago That’s simply not how the current economy works. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago That’s a wholly different topic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cy888@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) China makes cars that no one else can permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago They assemble cars from parts sourced externally. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -8 points 3 months ago (5 children) The problem is they modify goods, not produce them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children) Intellectual property shouldn’t exist. If China wants to “steal” ram designs and sell them for cheaper, then LeT tHe fReE mArKeT wOrK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago That’s simply not how the current economy works. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago That’s a wholly different topic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cy888@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) China makes cars that no one else can permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago They assemble cars from parts sourced externally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children) Intellectual property shouldn’t exist. If China wants to “steal” ram designs and sell them for cheaper, then LeT tHe fReE mArKeT wOrK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago That’s simply not how the current economy works. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago That’s a wholly different topic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago That’s simply not how the current economy works. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago That’s a wholly different topic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cy888@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) China makes cars that no one else can permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago They assemble cars from parts sourced externally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago They assemble cars from parts sourced externally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 3 months ago (4 children) But they'll still have plenty of people by 2030. And if they're not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (3 children) And if they’re not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. Every Chinese book I've read screams at me nationalism and xenophobia, be it modern fantasy, 50 years old detective series or comedy. And immigration to China is - currently - heavily restricted. Like damn heavily. And you will not become a permanent resident, and there is literally 0 chance of becoming a citizen, unless you're of Han Chinese descent, preferably first generation, preferably looking Chinese, and you can't have dual nationality (from last census in 2020 about 17.000 people ever got a citizenship, which is what. 0.0012% of population? And the permanent residency in 2017 was about 10k total). My country, Poland (about 38m people), grants more than that every year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Yeah, this will probably have interesting consequences down the line, but not in 2030, and maybe not 2100 even permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) maybe not 2100 even Chinese government does not seem to agree with you, considering its: Pro natal policies Heavy research into automation being sold as "to fill in labour gaps" (even though the gig work is skyrocketing) Retirement age reforms increasing the retirement age Chinese universities also do not agree with your flippant attitude and are literally alarmist about it: Tsinghua projections (that accurately predicted peak of population) show halving the population (and that > 50% will be people over retirement age) by the year 2100: https://www.dess.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1226/2472.htm On the other hand the dude who was saying something about collapsing in 3 years also didn't knew what he was talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (3 children) And if they’re not as xenophobic as some other countries I could mention, they could easily solve the population issue through immigration. Every Chinese book I've read screams at me nationalism and xenophobia, be it modern fantasy, 50 years old detective series or comedy. And immigration to China is - currently - heavily restricted. Like damn heavily. And you will not become a permanent resident, and there is literally 0 chance of becoming a citizen, unless you're of Han Chinese descent, preferably first generation, preferably looking Chinese, and you can't have dual nationality (from last census in 2020 about 17.000 people ever got a citizenship, which is what. 0.0012% of population? And the permanent residency in 2017 was about 10k total). My country, Poland (about 38m people), grants more than that every year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Yeah, this will probably have interesting consequences down the line, but not in 2030, and maybe not 2100 even permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) maybe not 2100 even Chinese government does not seem to agree with you, considering its: Pro natal policies Heavy research into automation being sold as "to fill in labour gaps" (even though the gig work is skyrocketing) Retirement age reforms increasing the retirement age Chinese universities also do not agree with your flippant attitude and are literally alarmist about it: Tsinghua projections (that accurately predicted peak of population) show halving the population (and that > 50% will be people over retirement age) by the year 2100: https://www.dess.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1226/2472.htm On the other hand the dude who was saying something about collapsing in 3 years also didn't knew what he was talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) Yeah, this will probably have interesting consequences down the line, but not in 2030, and maybe not 2100 even permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) maybe not 2100 even Chinese government does not seem to agree with you, considering its: Pro natal policies Heavy research into automation being sold as "to fill in labour gaps" (even though the gig work is skyrocketing) Retirement age reforms increasing the retirement age Chinese universities also do not agree with your flippant attitude and are literally alarmist about it: Tsinghua projections (that accurately predicted peak of population) show halving the population (and that > 50% will be people over retirement age) by the year 2100: https://www.dess.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1226/2472.htm On the other hand the dude who was saying something about collapsing in 3 years also didn't knew what he was talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) maybe not 2100 even Chinese government does not seem to agree with you, considering its: Pro natal policies Heavy research into automation being sold as "to fill in labour gaps" (even though the gig work is skyrocketing) Retirement age reforms increasing the retirement age Chinese universities also do not agree with your flippant attitude and are literally alarmist about it: Tsinghua projections (that accurately predicted peak of population) show halving the population (and that > 50% will be people over retirement age) by the year 2100: https://www.dess.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1226/2472.htm On the other hand the dude who was saying something about collapsing in 3 years also didn't knew what he was talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 point 3 months ago Imo, if they succeed in automating everything they probably will not have to care about drop in population either permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thetrekkersparky@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Yeah, but if they started right now I bet they could pump out some new adults inside of 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago They literally can’t. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago They literally can’t. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Their birth rate is “In collapse” because they already have a gigantic population that is too big. permalink fedilink source parent