▲ 460 ▼ Scientists found a cannabis compound that relieves pain without the high (www.sciencedaily.com) submitted 2 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 195 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 46 points 2 months ago (40 children) Because you’re not allowed to feel good with any medical treatment. No. permalink fedilink source hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 123 points 2 months ago (1 child) Or because plenty of people want medicine without unwanted side effects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 months ago Yah the mental haze isn't a fun trap to fall into. (young me as source) permalink fedilink source parent [–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 2 months ago (35 children) Maybe you want to drive a car safely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 35 child comments replies: [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -45 points 2 months ago (34 children) Then I use paracetamol and codeine, and stay off medicinal cannabis permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 34 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 57 points 2 months ago (20 children) codeine is an opiate. you're not allowed to drive on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children) let me literally tell you what my pain management MD told me. "Practice doing the sobriety tests on opioids until you can pass" i think i had the worst doctor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) was his last name zuckerkorn? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (8 children) In UK you can if it doesn't affect your driving. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -20 points 2 months ago (7 children) I am here I take one tablet, if I need to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (6 children) "Take opioids instead of non-psychoactive cannabinoids for pain" is a wild take my guy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago i am sure this cannabis is safer than paracetamol or codeine. and there are people who want that permalink fedilink source parent [–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (10 children) Codeine can still make people sleepy and sluggish. It's still an opioid that can lead to dependence and withdrawal. It still has negative GI side effects causing constipation. It's not a good idea for driving while under the influence. If this can help people in pain without side effect that can cause impairment, why not. Getting high off of cannabis can still be allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago the first time i took Hydrocodone was after I had my wisdom teeth pulled. I slept a full 8 hours, got up, took my next dose, and then proceeded to pass out for ANOTHER full 8 hours. I put two and two together pretty quickly and just decided to deal with the pain. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -9 points 2 months ago (8 children) I’m not going to argue, really I take one if I have to drive and I’m in pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (3 children) You don't need to argue. You just need to accept that every time you do that you put your life, and the lives of the people around you, in danger. And that's simply a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) But if you have cannabis without the high, you could use that instead and be safer. I’d love to have the option as a medical marijuana user. Not as punishment for having pain, but for having more options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago* Ok thats not exactly an improvement. permalink fedilink source parent [–] homes@piefed.world 17 points 2 months ago On one hand, it sounds like Puritanical bullshit, but on the other hand, I’d like the option. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago Idk some people like going to work without pain. For me cannabis is an incredibly strong depressant. I can feel suicidal for free with pain, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 123 points 2 months ago (1 child) Or because plenty of people want medicine without unwanted side effects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 months ago Yah the mental haze isn't a fun trap to fall into. (young me as source) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 months ago Yah the mental haze isn't a fun trap to fall into. (young me as source) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 2 months ago (35 children) Maybe you want to drive a car safely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 35 child comments replies: [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -45 points 2 months ago (34 children) Then I use paracetamol and codeine, and stay off medicinal cannabis permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 34 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 57 points 2 months ago (20 children) codeine is an opiate. you're not allowed to drive on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children) let me literally tell you what my pain management MD told me. "Practice doing the sobriety tests on opioids until you can pass" i think i had the worst doctor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) was his last name zuckerkorn? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (8 children) In UK you can if it doesn't affect your driving. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -20 points 2 months ago (7 children) I am here I take one tablet, if I need to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (6 children) "Take opioids instead of non-psychoactive cannabinoids for pain" is a wild take my guy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago i am sure this cannabis is safer than paracetamol or codeine. and there are people who want that permalink fedilink source parent [–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (10 children) Codeine can still make people sleepy and sluggish. It's still an opioid that can lead to dependence and withdrawal. It still has negative GI side effects causing constipation. It's not a good idea for driving while under the influence. If this can help people in pain without side effect that can cause impairment, why not. Getting high off of cannabis can still be allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago the first time i took Hydrocodone was after I had my wisdom teeth pulled. I slept a full 8 hours, got up, took my next dose, and then proceeded to pass out for ANOTHER full 8 hours. I put two and two together pretty quickly and just decided to deal with the pain. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -9 points 2 months ago (8 children) I’m not going to argue, really I take one if I have to drive and I’m in pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (3 children) You don't need to argue. You just need to accept that every time you do that you put your life, and the lives of the people around you, in danger. And that's simply a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) But if you have cannabis without the high, you could use that instead and be safer. I’d love to have the option as a medical marijuana user. Not as punishment for having pain, but for having more options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago* Ok thats not exactly an improvement. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -45 points 2 months ago (34 children) Then I use paracetamol and codeine, and stay off medicinal cannabis permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 34 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 57 points 2 months ago (20 children) codeine is an opiate. you're not allowed to drive on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children) let me literally tell you what my pain management MD told me. "Practice doing the sobriety tests on opioids until you can pass" i think i had the worst doctor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) was his last name zuckerkorn? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (8 children) In UK you can if it doesn't affect your driving. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -20 points 2 months ago (7 children) I am here I take one tablet, if I need to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (6 children) "Take opioids instead of non-psychoactive cannabinoids for pain" is a wild take my guy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago i am sure this cannabis is safer than paracetamol or codeine. and there are people who want that permalink fedilink source parent [–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (10 children) Codeine can still make people sleepy and sluggish. It's still an opioid that can lead to dependence and withdrawal. It still has negative GI side effects causing constipation. It's not a good idea for driving while under the influence. If this can help people in pain without side effect that can cause impairment, why not. Getting high off of cannabis can still be allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago the first time i took Hydrocodone was after I had my wisdom teeth pulled. I slept a full 8 hours, got up, took my next dose, and then proceeded to pass out for ANOTHER full 8 hours. I put two and two together pretty quickly and just decided to deal with the pain. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -9 points 2 months ago (8 children) I’m not going to argue, really I take one if I have to drive and I’m in pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (3 children) You don't need to argue. You just need to accept that every time you do that you put your life, and the lives of the people around you, in danger. And that's simply a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) But if you have cannabis without the high, you could use that instead and be safer. I’d love to have the option as a medical marijuana user. Not as punishment for having pain, but for having more options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago* Ok thats not exactly an improvement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 57 points 2 months ago (20 children) codeine is an opiate. you're not allowed to drive on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children) let me literally tell you what my pain management MD told me. "Practice doing the sobriety tests on opioids until you can pass" i think i had the worst doctor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) was his last name zuckerkorn? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (8 children) In UK you can if it doesn't affect your driving. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -20 points 2 months ago (7 children) I am here I take one tablet, if I need to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (6 children) "Take opioids instead of non-psychoactive cannabinoids for pain" is a wild take my guy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children) let me literally tell you what my pain management MD told me. "Practice doing the sobriety tests on opioids until you can pass" i think i had the worst doctor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) was his last name zuckerkorn? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) was his last name zuckerkorn? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago i wish i was joking permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (8 children) In UK you can if it doesn't affect your driving. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -20 points 2 months ago (7 children) I am here I take one tablet, if I need to permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (6 children) "Take opioids instead of non-psychoactive cannabinoids for pain" is a wild take my guy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (6 children) "Take opioids instead of non-psychoactive cannabinoids for pain" is a wild take my guy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago I once had a social worker tell me I should stop smoking weed and get on opiates. I told him he could go fuck himself. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -10 points 2 months ago (4 children) There was an injection of tongue in cheek with the first comment as well, but that seemed to have missed most There’s a big difference between one Panadeine forte and the opioids you might be thinking of. Sometimes it’s just a paracetamol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (3 children) ...paracetamol is not an opioid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago (2 children) Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) i think you may need to do a second pass on your sentence structure, a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding your posts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -4 points 2 months ago They didn’t originally, I was five up at one point. Then the people who hang out in the kitchen came out To be honest I don’t really care. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago i am sure this cannabis is safer than paracetamol or codeine. and there are people who want that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (10 children) Codeine can still make people sleepy and sluggish. It's still an opioid that can lead to dependence and withdrawal. It still has negative GI side effects causing constipation. It's not a good idea for driving while under the influence. If this can help people in pain without side effect that can cause impairment, why not. Getting high off of cannabis can still be allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago the first time i took Hydrocodone was after I had my wisdom teeth pulled. I slept a full 8 hours, got up, took my next dose, and then proceeded to pass out for ANOTHER full 8 hours. I put two and two together pretty quickly and just decided to deal with the pain. permalink fedilink source parent [+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -9 points 2 months ago (8 children) I’m not going to argue, really I take one if I have to drive and I’m in pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (3 children) You don't need to argue. You just need to accept that every time you do that you put your life, and the lives of the people around you, in danger. And that's simply a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) But if you have cannabis without the high, you could use that instead and be safer. I’d love to have the option as a medical marijuana user. Not as punishment for having pain, but for having more options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago the first time i took Hydrocodone was after I had my wisdom teeth pulled. I slept a full 8 hours, got up, took my next dose, and then proceeded to pass out for ANOTHER full 8 hours. I put two and two together pretty quickly and just decided to deal with the pain. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -9 points 2 months ago (8 children) I’m not going to argue, really I take one if I have to drive and I’m in pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (3 children) You don't need to argue. You just need to accept that every time you do that you put your life, and the lives of the people around you, in danger. And that's simply a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) But if you have cannabis without the high, you could use that instead and be safer. I’d love to have the option as a medical marijuana user. Not as punishment for having pain, but for having more options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (3 children) You don't need to argue. You just need to accept that every time you do that you put your life, and the lives of the people around you, in danger. And that's simply a fact. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago* Yeah look I think there might be a difference between one Panadeine forte and hard core opiates that have people nodding off. Certainly, it’s a lot better than vaping two caps before driving and nine times out of ten it’s just a paracetamol anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Uranium_Green@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) My friend, in the UK you can literally buy Panadol both with and without codiene over the counter at a pharmacy They have said multiple times they use the without for the most part, which is just paracetamol (acetaminophen). The UK and elsewhere don't have the same problem with opiates as the US does. It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you, in effect giving the police reason to stop you from driving if impaired by it and legal means to prosecute you if you cause harm due to the imparement. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jako302@feddit.org 1 point 2 months ago It's not an offense to drive on medications unless it impares you Its not that its no offense, you simply can't be prosecuted if no one knows about it. But that doesn't equal legal. If you get into an accident and anyone finds out that you took opioide, even just medical painkillers, you will be attributed most of the blame in court. That also means I could drive whilst high from my cannabis prescription if there was no imparement. A prescription only provides defense in court, not an immunity to prosecution. It still is in your responsibility to prove that you weren't impaired by your medication, which is nearly impossible. If your tolerance is high enough that your reaction time doesn't decrease, then its nearly useless either way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) But if you have cannabis without the high, you could use that instead and be safer. I’d love to have the option as a medical marijuana user. Not as punishment for having pain, but for having more options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Yeah look, I don’t it’s a bad thing at all, I know this would benefit many people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Your parent comment resonated with me, I get that knee jerk reaction about punishing pain. But yeah I can begrudgingly admit that I would use this if it was available for driving and such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago Fortunately I don’t have really bad pain and the opiates I take if I need to are very mild. There’s a bit of cynicism in my comment, I’m in Australia so any excuse my governments can find to destroy enjoyment gained as an extra, they’ll do it. At the end of the day anything we can do with cannabis extracts that help people in any way id support, including this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago* Ok thats not exactly an improvement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] homes@piefed.world 17 points 2 months ago On one hand, it sounds like Puritanical bullshit, but on the other hand, I’d like the option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago Idk some people like going to work without pain. For me cannabis is an incredibly strong depressant. I can feel suicidal for free with pain, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent