▲ 460 ▼ Scientists found a cannabis compound that relieves pain without the high (www.sciencedaily.com) submitted 2 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 195 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tabular@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (8 children) In UK you can if it doesn't affect your driving. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago (7 children) and how do you tell if it has? imagine if the standard for alcohol was the same... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) If you can drive safely then go ahead but if you're impaired by too much of anything that you would drive poorly then don't. I thought this was common sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children) the uk sticks out in the statistics of legal limits for alcohol in europe at 0.8‰ BAC; most countries are at 0.2 with some having a zero-tolerance policy, because it affects people so differently and it's hard to tell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (4 children) Interesting, if other countries have less driving accidents then it may be worth considering lowering our legal limit. That is, if we can actually detect something is affecting them. Unless the driver is already driving erratically then we must presume the effects of any drink or other drugs isn't affecting them. Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. We trust people to change their own break pads, I trust them to know if they can drive on painkillers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Mandatory testing or randomly pulling people over to test them would be a gross over-reach. that's... the standard in all of europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) By the government? That is sincerly horrifying if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) interesting take from the country with 95% of europe's surveillance cameras. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago I don't know what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent