481
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

No dude. These women are doctors, lawyers, and other high income highly educated professionals.

That is how they view relationships. their end-goal in a relationship is not happiness or personal satisfaction, or any of that, it's about getting more money. they see relationships as just another career move and if you aren't going to increase their net-worth substantially, they have no interest in you as a human being. if you cant provide them with a massive increase in their income or lifestyle, you are not worthy of them.

it's cold and calculated and careerist, but this is often how they grew up and their entire life is about the score in their bank account being bigger than someone else's. they also see children this same way, there is no point to having children unless the children will be able to attend Harvard and become wealthy professionals themselves. if you ask them what they'd do if their kid coudln't only get into a state school they basically say they would disown their kid or otherwise be ashamed of them.

everything to them is about dollar signs and social prestige that comes with it.

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago

I can’t say I’m entirely convinced, considering this conversation is taking place in a greentext community, but I am fairly glad im past my dating woes

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

you don't have to be convinced. lots of people doing lots of thing exists that you don't know about.

I've also had women of this ilk ask me to be part of their male sex harem and flip out telling me i'm a horrible asshole when I politely declined. i doubt you ever encountered that while you were dating either and you are free to assume that is also a fabrication/lie.

but also I doubt think you are in the same circles I am. But there are plenty of New Yorker and NYT times articles about these people, because they tend to only exist in a few select cities in a few neighborhoods in those cities, and they are often the same class of folks who dominate the media industry. These are the people who 'network' their toddlers and infants and whose marriages have performance bonuses tied to their spousal duty targets. They very much exist and they have turned relationships into business arrangements.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/opinion/sunday/poor-little-rich-women.html

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I’ve certainly not encountered most of this. But, once again, this is a greentext community. Objectively, I’d be an idiot to believe anything here. For an abundance of reasons, this simply isn’t a place to have a conversation about the negative qualities of people, particularly women, with the expectation that others should or would listen.

You’re in the bread line beside the leaners and the laughers, talking about dividends.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
481 points (98.4% liked)

Greentext

8391 readers
448 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS