▲ 203 ▼ They finally did it: Reddit made it impossible for blind Redditors to moderate their own sub (web.archive.org) submitted 3 years ago by ruffsl@programming.dev to c/reddit@lemmy.world 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lucky0111@lemm.ee 37 points 3 years ago (5 children) Isn’t this a violation of the ADA? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 36 points 3 years ago (1 child) A few years ago I read about a group of lawyers, the self-serving greedy bastard kind of lawyers, that went around finding websites with accessibility violations and would file suit against them. With the way the laws are written the cases were slam dunks. The lawyers didn't actually care about the violations, it was just a way to make a quick buck. It would be a shame if reddit had to face a swarm of those piranhas. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fastfinge@rblind.com 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) You posted an image without alt-text in a thread about blind folks? Really? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Thurgo@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago Shame. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SGG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago To be fair that means we need to get those same lawyers to sue Lemmy for allowing that to happen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mods aren’t employees so the ADA wouldn’t apply here and constitute legal discrimination. Albeit this is pretty dang negligent from a business perspective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ADA doesn't just apply to employer/employee relationships. "The ADA is divided into four main sections, which are called Titles: Title I covers employment; Title II covers public entities and public transportation; Title III covers public accommodations and commercial facilities; and Title IV covers telecommunications" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I assumed the person I was responding to was talking about a violation of employer/employee regulations. When it comes to social media, I don’t believe the telecommunications pillar applies right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago Ya I don't think any of the sections apply. You are correct. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago Hopefully this is a slam dunk class action lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jacaw@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago I’ve worked with (read: done a tiny amount of work with) accessibility compliance and you basically only need a “we’re working towards accessibility” disclaimer somewhere to be legally covered. Not sure how that works with blatant regressions like this, though; I imagine a case could be made that their statement is a lie. permalink fedilink source parent [+] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) You accidentally double commented permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LittleYellowDigger@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m seeing that a lot on here. Might just be a bug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yeah I think server issues with the influx of users may have caused it. Or could be my crappy internet connection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 36 points 3 years ago (1 child) A few years ago I read about a group of lawyers, the self-serving greedy bastard kind of lawyers, that went around finding websites with accessibility violations and would file suit against them. With the way the laws are written the cases were slam dunks. The lawyers didn't actually care about the violations, it was just a way to make a quick buck. It would be a shame if reddit had to face a swarm of those piranhas. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fastfinge@rblind.com 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) You posted an image without alt-text in a thread about blind folks? Really? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Thurgo@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago Shame. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SGG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago To be fair that means we need to get those same lawyers to sue Lemmy for allowing that to happen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fastfinge@rblind.com 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) You posted an image without alt-text in a thread about blind folks? Really? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Thurgo@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago Shame. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SGG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago To be fair that means we need to get those same lawyers to sue Lemmy for allowing that to happen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fastfinge@rblind.com 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) You posted an image without alt-text in a thread about blind folks? Really? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Thurgo@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago Shame. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SGG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago To be fair that means we need to get those same lawyers to sue Lemmy for allowing that to happen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SGG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago To be fair that means we need to get those same lawyers to sue Lemmy for allowing that to happen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mods aren’t employees so the ADA wouldn’t apply here and constitute legal discrimination. Albeit this is pretty dang negligent from a business perspective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ADA doesn't just apply to employer/employee relationships. "The ADA is divided into four main sections, which are called Titles: Title I covers employment; Title II covers public entities and public transportation; Title III covers public accommodations and commercial facilities; and Title IV covers telecommunications" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I assumed the person I was responding to was talking about a violation of employer/employee regulations. When it comes to social media, I don’t believe the telecommunications pillar applies right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago Ya I don't think any of the sections apply. You are correct. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ADA doesn't just apply to employer/employee relationships. "The ADA is divided into four main sections, which are called Titles: Title I covers employment; Title II covers public entities and public transportation; Title III covers public accommodations and commercial facilities; and Title IV covers telecommunications" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I assumed the person I was responding to was talking about a violation of employer/employee regulations. When it comes to social media, I don’t believe the telecommunications pillar applies right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago Ya I don't think any of the sections apply. You are correct. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I assumed the person I was responding to was talking about a violation of employer/employee regulations. When it comes to social media, I don’t believe the telecommunications pillar applies right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago Ya I don't think any of the sections apply. You are correct. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago Ya I don't think any of the sections apply. You are correct. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago Hopefully this is a slam dunk class action lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jacaw@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago I’ve worked with (read: done a tiny amount of work with) accessibility compliance and you basically only need a “we’re working towards accessibility” disclaimer somewhere to be legally covered. Not sure how that works with blatant regressions like this, though; I imagine a case could be made that their statement is a lie. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) You accidentally double commented permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LittleYellowDigger@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m seeing that a lot on here. Might just be a bug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yeah I think server issues with the influx of users may have caused it. Or could be my crappy internet connection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) You accidentally double commented permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LittleYellowDigger@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m seeing that a lot on here. Might just be a bug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yeah I think server issues with the influx of users may have caused it. Or could be my crappy internet connection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LittleYellowDigger@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m seeing that a lot on here. Might just be a bug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yeah I think server issues with the influx of users may have caused it. Or could be my crappy internet connection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vinylshrapnel@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yeah I think server issues with the influx of users may have caused it. Or could be my crappy internet connection. permalink fedilink source parent