▲ 360 ▼ Bunch of other empty parking spots and this jerk chooses to park there. (startrek.website) submitted 3 years ago by RHTeebs@startrek.website to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Hedin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SomeRandomWords@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 years ago I've unfortunately met people before who think those areas are just another parking spot, so honestly I wouldn't be surprised if this was the real answer. permalink fedilink source parent [+] geogle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -3 points 3 years ago (3 children) Those trikes are very often ridden by handicapped riders who are entitled to the entire space. Not all handicap vehicles require ramp access on the side. Indeed, the overwhelming majority do not. Parking the way he did, he effectively added another handicap space to the lot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) He dint though. He parked in a spot clearly marked as no parking, and blocked the spot for those who need it most permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) How did he block anything? I could fit a handicap van with a right side ramp into that spot. I could back a handicap van with a left side ramp into that spot. I could pull or back a vehicle with a rear ramp or no ramp into that spot. Yes, he is blocking the ramp access on one side, but I have yet to see a handicap vehicle even equipped with ramps on both sides. (I think) all three of the spots in the photo are designated handicap parking. There are three (presumably) handicap vehicles parked in those three spots, and yet the way he has parked, there is still room for a fourth. You are aware that van-accessible handicapped spaces only need ramp access on one side, right? That space has ramp access on both sides only because those two ramp access areas serve three spaces. He only blocked van access in the far space; that far space is still accessible to non-van handicapped vehicles. The remaining ramp space is still available to serve the other two spaces. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Hedin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago Man, we have some real assholes on this platform. Who TF down voted you for sharing information? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SomeRandomWords@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 years ago I've unfortunately met people before who think those areas are just another parking spot, so honestly I wouldn't be surprised if this was the real answer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -3 points 3 years ago (3 children) Those trikes are very often ridden by handicapped riders who are entitled to the entire space. Not all handicap vehicles require ramp access on the side. Indeed, the overwhelming majority do not. Parking the way he did, he effectively added another handicap space to the lot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) He dint though. He parked in a spot clearly marked as no parking, and blocked the spot for those who need it most permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) How did he block anything? I could fit a handicap van with a right side ramp into that spot. I could back a handicap van with a left side ramp into that spot. I could pull or back a vehicle with a rear ramp or no ramp into that spot. Yes, he is blocking the ramp access on one side, but I have yet to see a handicap vehicle even equipped with ramps on both sides. (I think) all three of the spots in the photo are designated handicap parking. There are three (presumably) handicap vehicles parked in those three spots, and yet the way he has parked, there is still room for a fourth. You are aware that van-accessible handicapped spaces only need ramp access on one side, right? That space has ramp access on both sides only because those two ramp access areas serve three spaces. He only blocked van access in the far space; that far space is still accessible to non-van handicapped vehicles. The remaining ramp space is still available to serve the other two spaces. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Hedin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago Man, we have some real assholes on this platform. Who TF down voted you for sharing information? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) He dint though. He parked in a spot clearly marked as no parking, and blocked the spot for those who need it most permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) How did he block anything? I could fit a handicap van with a right side ramp into that spot. I could back a handicap van with a left side ramp into that spot. I could pull or back a vehicle with a rear ramp or no ramp into that spot. Yes, he is blocking the ramp access on one side, but I have yet to see a handicap vehicle even equipped with ramps on both sides. (I think) all three of the spots in the photo are designated handicap parking. There are three (presumably) handicap vehicles parked in those three spots, and yet the way he has parked, there is still room for a fourth. You are aware that van-accessible handicapped spaces only need ramp access on one side, right? That space has ramp access on both sides only because those two ramp access areas serve three spaces. He only blocked van access in the far space; that far space is still accessible to non-van handicapped vehicles. The remaining ramp space is still available to serve the other two spaces. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) How did he block anything? I could fit a handicap van with a right side ramp into that spot. I could back a handicap van with a left side ramp into that spot. I could pull or back a vehicle with a rear ramp or no ramp into that spot. Yes, he is blocking the ramp access on one side, but I have yet to see a handicap vehicle even equipped with ramps on both sides. (I think) all three of the spots in the photo are designated handicap parking. There are three (presumably) handicap vehicles parked in those three spots, and yet the way he has parked, there is still room for a fourth. You are aware that van-accessible handicapped spaces only need ramp access on one side, right? That space has ramp access on both sides only because those two ramp access areas serve three spaces. He only blocked van access in the far space; that far space is still accessible to non-van handicapped vehicles. The remaining ramp space is still available to serve the other two spaces. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago Man, we have some real assholes on this platform. Who TF down voted you for sharing information? permalink fedilink source parent
