▲ 29 ▼ our very good EA billionaire friends are funding the Abundance movement (prospect.org) submitted 2 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems [M] to c/sneerclub@awful.systems 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] JFranek@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) Eh, still better than NIMBYs. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) One day I am gonna write my essay “NIMBYism does not exist” outlining the way that self-professed YIMBYs have carted together a massive swathe of different ideas and motivations into a single huge distraction from actually thinking about politics ah, i see the other person already made the some point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JFranek@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I am a simple man. I just want more trains, more public transit and more housing next to said public transit. And for better and worse YIMBYs are one of the few people I've seen to take that seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) The essay will include a short section at the beginning acknowledging that lots of self-identified YIMBYs are good people with some sensible ideas about getting hold of the right things, followed by a long explanation of why the essay will not allow this fact to be used to once again derail its point, already stated in the title (“NIMBYism does not exist”), that they have carted together a massive swathe of different ideas and motivations into a single huge distraction from actually thinking about politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago If anything I would expect the nonexistence of NIMBYs to be a good sign for the good-faith YIMBYs because it suggests that the opposition to their preferred policies are both more reasonable and less unified than the existence of a coherent NIMBY ideology would suggest. Of course if your YIMBYism is just a subset of technocratic authoritarianism then the fact that NIMBYs aren't an actual thing is both convenient but hard to acknowledge. Crushing a mirage under your boot in the name of Progress and Civilization is easier than crushing actual people, but if that reality becomes too obvious you start looking like Star Wars kid. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago* (1 child) One day I am gonna write my essay “NIMBYism does not exist” outlining the way that self-professed YIMBYs have carted together a massive swathe of different ideas and motivations into a single huge distraction from actually thinking about politics ah, i see the other person already made the some point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JFranek@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I am a simple man. I just want more trains, more public transit and more housing next to said public transit. And for better and worse YIMBYs are one of the few people I've seen to take that seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) The essay will include a short section at the beginning acknowledging that lots of self-identified YIMBYs are good people with some sensible ideas about getting hold of the right things, followed by a long explanation of why the essay will not allow this fact to be used to once again derail its point, already stated in the title (“NIMBYism does not exist”), that they have carted together a massive swathe of different ideas and motivations into a single huge distraction from actually thinking about politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago If anything I would expect the nonexistence of NIMBYs to be a good sign for the good-faith YIMBYs because it suggests that the opposition to their preferred policies are both more reasonable and less unified than the existence of a coherent NIMBY ideology would suggest. Of course if your YIMBYism is just a subset of technocratic authoritarianism then the fact that NIMBYs aren't an actual thing is both convenient but hard to acknowledge. Crushing a mirage under your boot in the name of Progress and Civilization is easier than crushing actual people, but if that reality becomes too obvious you start looking like Star Wars kid. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JFranek@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I am a simple man. I just want more trains, more public transit and more housing next to said public transit. And for better and worse YIMBYs are one of the few people I've seen to take that seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) The essay will include a short section at the beginning acknowledging that lots of self-identified YIMBYs are good people with some sensible ideas about getting hold of the right things, followed by a long explanation of why the essay will not allow this fact to be used to once again derail its point, already stated in the title (“NIMBYism does not exist”), that they have carted together a massive swathe of different ideas and motivations into a single huge distraction from actually thinking about politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago If anything I would expect the nonexistence of NIMBYs to be a good sign for the good-faith YIMBYs because it suggests that the opposition to their preferred policies are both more reasonable and less unified than the existence of a coherent NIMBY ideology would suggest. Of course if your YIMBYism is just a subset of technocratic authoritarianism then the fact that NIMBYs aren't an actual thing is both convenient but hard to acknowledge. Crushing a mirage under your boot in the name of Progress and Civilization is easier than crushing actual people, but if that reality becomes too obvious you start looking like Star Wars kid. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) The essay will include a short section at the beginning acknowledging that lots of self-identified YIMBYs are good people with some sensible ideas about getting hold of the right things, followed by a long explanation of why the essay will not allow this fact to be used to once again derail its point, already stated in the title (“NIMBYism does not exist”), that they have carted together a massive swathe of different ideas and motivations into a single huge distraction from actually thinking about politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago If anything I would expect the nonexistence of NIMBYs to be a good sign for the good-faith YIMBYs because it suggests that the opposition to their preferred policies are both more reasonable and less unified than the existence of a coherent NIMBY ideology would suggest. Of course if your YIMBYism is just a subset of technocratic authoritarianism then the fact that NIMBYs aren't an actual thing is both convenient but hard to acknowledge. Crushing a mirage under your boot in the name of Progress and Civilization is easier than crushing actual people, but if that reality becomes too obvious you start looking like Star Wars kid. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago If anything I would expect the nonexistence of NIMBYs to be a good sign for the good-faith YIMBYs because it suggests that the opposition to their preferred policies are both more reasonable and less unified than the existence of a coherent NIMBY ideology would suggest. Of course if your YIMBYism is just a subset of technocratic authoritarianism then the fact that NIMBYs aren't an actual thing is both convenient but hard to acknowledge. Crushing a mirage under your boot in the name of Progress and Civilization is easier than crushing actual people, but if that reality becomes too obvious you start looking like Star Wars kid. permalink fedilink source parent