you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Most of the casualties were from bombers for a long time already, this is that but one step removed.
It's bad for a different reason, you in this case don't exist anymore. We used to have people killing people, now there are autonomous robots doing this, and that's a new, completely different class of warfare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    The scariest thing is, autonomous "soldiers" can do what bombers cannot: Go building-to-building and door-to-door.

    The cost and risk of urban engagements and "boots on the ground" was usually the final commitment of warfare.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Even before bombers existed for every person killed on a battlefield a ton of people who didn't see a single enemy soldier died because that army had destroyed or used up the region's food supplies or introduced a new disease or diverted a river's water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yeah, and also, many political leaders just say, "kill your enemies," and the deed gets done nowadays. I'm pretty sure that's been the case for a long time too.

  • source
  • parent