▲ 708 ▼ 'At some point you've got to make money': Goldman's top AI skeptic warns the clock is running out ahead of OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs (fortune.com) submitted 2 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children) Is that a forecast or fanfic? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) They worked on it in stages—starting with early ideas up to mid-2025, then continuing to build from there. But instead of sticking with that first draft, they threw it out and started over from scratch. They also didn’t settle on just one ending. After finishing their first version (the one marked in red), they created a second, more hopeful outcome starting from roughly the same point. That version also went through several rounds of revisions. And this wasn’t made up out of nowhere—it was based on about 25 tabletop exercises and feedback from over 100 people, including dozens of experts who work directly in AI governance and AI technical fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) including dozens of experts who work directly in AI governance and AI technical fields. All of those people are fucking clowns and you know it. They're these morons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalist_community permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) I didn't know it and although the read was interesting to me I didn't immediately make the connection, no divisiveness intended on my behalf. Disregard the post if you like, we are all free to listen to eachother's point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago we are all free to listen to eachother’s point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . Sure, but I'm not going to pretend for a second that the pseudointellectual masturbation of "rationalists" is worth a damn just because their narratives were useful to capalist oligarchs so some people call them "experts" now. What a farce permalink fedilink source parent [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago Fanfic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) They worked on it in stages—starting with early ideas up to mid-2025, then continuing to build from there. But instead of sticking with that first draft, they threw it out and started over from scratch. They also didn’t settle on just one ending. After finishing their first version (the one marked in red), they created a second, more hopeful outcome starting from roughly the same point. That version also went through several rounds of revisions. And this wasn’t made up out of nowhere—it was based on about 25 tabletop exercises and feedback from over 100 people, including dozens of experts who work directly in AI governance and AI technical fields. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) including dozens of experts who work directly in AI governance and AI technical fields. All of those people are fucking clowns and you know it. They're these morons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalist_community permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) I didn't know it and although the read was interesting to me I didn't immediately make the connection, no divisiveness intended on my behalf. Disregard the post if you like, we are all free to listen to eachother's point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago we are all free to listen to eachother’s point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . Sure, but I'm not going to pretend for a second that the pseudointellectual masturbation of "rationalists" is worth a damn just because their narratives were useful to capalist oligarchs so some people call them "experts" now. What a farce permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) including dozens of experts who work directly in AI governance and AI technical fields. All of those people are fucking clowns and you know it. They're these morons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalist_community permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) I didn't know it and although the read was interesting to me I didn't immediately make the connection, no divisiveness intended on my behalf. Disregard the post if you like, we are all free to listen to eachother's point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago we are all free to listen to eachother’s point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . Sure, but I'm not going to pretend for a second that the pseudointellectual masturbation of "rationalists" is worth a damn just because their narratives were useful to capalist oligarchs so some people call them "experts" now. What a farce permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) I didn't know it and although the read was interesting to me I didn't immediately make the connection, no divisiveness intended on my behalf. Disregard the post if you like, we are all free to listen to eachother's point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago we are all free to listen to eachother’s point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . Sure, but I'm not going to pretend for a second that the pseudointellectual masturbation of "rationalists" is worth a damn just because their narratives were useful to capalist oligarchs so some people call them "experts" now. What a farce permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago we are all free to listen to eachother’s point of views, then arrive at our own conclusions . Sure, but I'm not going to pretend for a second that the pseudointellectual masturbation of "rationalists" is worth a damn just because their narratives were useful to capalist oligarchs so some people call them "experts" now. What a farce permalink fedilink source parent