you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Why not? What's wrong with having a day composed of 1000 chroners, or 1 kilochroner which can be divided into either 10 centichroners or 100 decachroners?

We can even divide each chroner into 1000 millichroners, or for scientific purposes, a million microchroners, a billion nanochroners, or a trillion picochroners.

So much more sense than 60 seconds times 60 minutes times 24 hours. What even is a second, anyway? When was it defined as a constant, by whom, and against what reference? It's completely arbitrary, I tell you!

And then when you extend that to 7 days, times 4 to 4.43 weeks, times 12 months before you finally get into decimals (decades, centuries, millenia, etc.), it's insanity!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    As a true believer in SI units, nonetheless:

    When was it [the "second", the smallest unit of time-measure under insanity-rules for unit hierarchy] defined as a constant, by whom, and against what reference?

    I have to notice, as a long-time student of being-a-person - for ~most folks, a "second" is reasonably close to the length of a single heartbeat. It's imprecise (badly depending on lots of stuff), and so maybe I'm just finding coincidence that has nothing to do with anything.

    BUT if we're talkin bout earliest references for attempting to "measure" ongoing time, I mean, look no further, fellow probable-human-with-heartbeat!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    60 bpm is about typical for a resting heart rate, I suppose. So that could make sense.

    About as much sense as positing that humans use decimal numeral systems (ignoring whatever the fuck the Romans used) because they have ten fingers.

    No way to really confirm, but it seems a likely guess.

    I wonder if Parmenides talks about it at all...

    Also, how did they even standardize this before digital clocks? Like did the first clock maker tell all his apprentices "This clock ticks every second. One tick is one second. Every clock you make must tick at exactly the same rate."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Now that that's going away maybe we'll finally have metric time. The age of the chroner is upon us!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Oh you're right, it's becoming permanent. Normal time is going away.

    What an altered dimension we've found ourselves in. Poor Harambe... 😔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    The US.

    There's a bill fresh out of committee that would put (most of) us on permanent DST. It's got some bipartisan support and the Angry Orange has said he's in favor of it.

    https://www.factcheck.org/2026/06/trumps-push-to-make-daylight-saving-time-permanent/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment