you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

It also gives some boundaries what can be done. Single lunatic voted in can't do unlimited damage before next election. But it's not a "hard rule", even big changes can be made somewhat quickly if there's sufficient majority behind the change, there just very rarely is. Also, small changes are easier to sell to their peers, so slow and steady changes are kind of built in to the system from the ground up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 3 points 4 months ago

    "Single lunatic voted in" did a lot of damage exactly through unanimous vote. That's how Orban stopped a lot of good things.

    Unanimous vote can work with a group of maybe 5. With more than that and you always will have too much bickering and blocking.

  • source
  • parent