you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

Yeah - that tracks.

I'm tending toward the interpretation that what Martin and the rest of the upper echelon of the DNC wanted was a subtle whitewash - one that would acknowledge the rather obvious problems of corporate money and support for genocide, but then spin some fanciful reason that those weren't really problems, so it'd be fine when the DNC, as they fully intend, keep on doing what they've been doing.

But they not only didn't get that - they got a poorly written mish - mash of platitudes and gibberish that looks like it was slapped together, mostly via LLM, at the eleventh hour.

And if they spent most of the time during which they were meant to be drawing it up locked instead in a crippling tug-of-war over what it should or should not say, that'd explain that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    But they not only didn’t get that

    Agreed. I may be projecting my own experience but it looks a lot like what happens in top heavy corporations with outdated perspectives. The old guard has the final say in what isn't done but they can't overrule widespread weaponized incompetence since nobody doing the actual work agrees with their vision or wants to put their name and reputation on something so disconnected from reality. People don't overtly disagree but then endlessly stall.

  • source
  • parent