Authorities brought 20 police cars, five SWAT officers, and drones to her house

https://www.twitch.tv/grammacrackers/clip/CharmingSolidNoodleKevinTurtle-CCpMMy7EX_W4v7_S

update: Found this video from local news https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGeb3cuqLxE

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 3 months ago (8 children)

How about the police do, idk, like 5 min of police work to verify literally any part of the story first?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    things like this can often be very time sensitive, beyond that exactly how would they verify it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Call people in the neighborhood, ask if anything is off? Send in a single car to scope out the scene, while keeping reinforcements in the wings? Ask 911 where the call originated, and adjust expectations based on that?

    At least two of these things can be done while the police begins to move towards the destination, as intel gathering doesn't require policeman to be making the inquiries, just support staff.

    0000

    Fact of the matter, is that American police are the same breed of 'warrior' that Pete Hegseth is: Bloodthirsty, undisciplined, incompetent, and in service to powers of capital and hate, not the citizens they are supposed to serve.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Like what? Do you have an example?

    I don't really believe that swat is necessary even in theory.

    If someone is being held hostage, call in a negotiator. If it's a bomb, bomb squad. What precisely is the swat team for?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Uvalde was time sensitive and real and yet we have video of police standing around in the hallways scrolling through Facebook on their phones while children were being murdered just feet away. Those pigs didn't face any accountability. Don't forget police took cases all the way to the Supreme Court to have it declared that they have zero duty to protect people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Exactly, like asking "is the caller even in the same area? Who lives there? Is this place usually agitated?" Which seems like they would need to know before going in anyway...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Exactly. They treat this like a bomb threat when the perpetrator gets arrested, but completely gloss over the fact that the police are "the bomb" in this scenario and as human beings, they have full agency over their own actions. They should most definitely spend 5 minutes to determine the real situation but they dont because they never face accountability and just go off of whatever some random caller told them, especially when it means playing soldier.

  • source
  • parent