944
Anon is a gamer (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 months ago by [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Why rely on someone else's go-ahead if you can just do something different? They didn't patent it for no reason - they want a cut if someone using it makes a bunch of money, and likely won't give you the go-ahead without that guarantee.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ofc, but that is the issue. Make the cut reasonable about some devs will be willing to pay the price.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    It'd have to be pretty reasonable. From the perspective of the people who have to pay, it's just as easy to tell the plebs beneath them to come up with something even better that doesn't require a fee. If they fail, it's because they were lazy, not because you're a bad leader, obviously.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent